The Third-Party Patching Conundrum
An anonymous reader writes, "The Zero Day Emergency Response Team, or ZERT, stepped out of the shadows a week ago to offer a quick patch for the Microsoft VML vulnerability. eWeek reports that reactions to third-party patches have been mixed. Jesper Johansson, a former Microsoft security consultant, said 'I will not use the unofficial patch, nor can I think of anyone I would recommend it to.' ZERT has enrolled former White House IT security expert Marcus Sachs as a spokesman of sorts. He told eWeek, 'This patch is just another arrow in the quiver. These guys are some of the best-known reverse engineers and security researchers. It's a tight-knit group that has worked for years to make the Internet a safer place. This isn't a patch created by some guy in a basement.' And while MS did release an out-of-band patch this week for XP, ZERT releases updates for operating systems that are out of MS support: Windows 98, Windows 98 SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000 and Windows 2000 SP3."
I never understood the need for security analysts, patches and all that. Why can't they just install some sort of filter in the internet tubes and be done with it? Maybe a good time to write Senator Ted Stevens?
8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
This patch is just another arrow in the quiver. These guys are some of the best-known reverse engineers and security researchers. It's a tight-knit group that has worked for years to make the Internet a safer place. This isn't a patch created by some guy in a basement.
Oh, so it's not a patch created by some guy in his basement. But what about some guy in his parents' basement?
Push Button, Receive Bacon
If we put filters on the tubes, they'll just clog up faster.
I don't know about you, but my e-mails don't travel that well when they're clogged..