Administration Ignored Bin Laden Intel

gettin-bored noted a nice article running in very high priority on the Washington Post, right up there on page 17 of the print edition, where it's revealed that the CIA Director warned Rice about Bin Laden two months before 9/11. And strangely, the meeting was never mentioned during all the 9/11 commission reports making you really question what exactly they were actually hearing that was more important than the CIA director telling the National Security Advisor that Bin Laden was going to attack Americans.

Comments

Are the web media consolidating too?

[krell]

Welcome to Slashkoz. Next up: discussion about Howard Dean's iPod list, and how George Soros is getting out of politics so he can concentrate on politics.

It's like playing whack-a-mole.

[Grendel Drago]

As I've addressed this before, I'm going to copy and (mostly) pasta:

He did? Is this about that guy from the Sudan who offered bin Laden to the US in 1996, which turned out not to be credible?

'Cause that 9/11 commission report states "[F]ormer Sudanese officials claim that Sudan offered to expel Bin Ladin to the United States." Which looks pretty definite. Except it continues, "Clinton administration officials deny ever receiving such an offer. We have not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim."

Which, of course, does't cut any ice with you, does it? How faith-based.