Slashdot Mirror


Ask an Open Source Venture Capitalist

Richard Gorman, of Bay Partners, is a venture capitalist. Part of his job is to seek out and finance open source companies. He's not easy to snow technically; he has a Master's degree in Computer Science from MIT. And he's not easy to snow financially, either; he also has a Master's in Management. This is a golden opporttunity for all you budding entrepreneurs out there to find out exactly what a tech-hip, management-hip venture capitalist looks for in an open source-based startup. (As always, Slashdot interview rules apply.)

14 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. On the subject of strong teams... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your profile states your feelings that a "very strong team" is important to the success of a startup. However, most startups only have the basis for a technology team in place, and rarely have a strong executive team. In a recent interview with Robert X. Cringley, technologist-cum-Venture Capitalist Bill Joy stated that his firm worked with startups to assist in installing team members that are missing from a venture. (Google is an excellent example of this in action, with Page and Brin turning over the Chief Executive reigns to the more experienced Eric Schmidt.)

    What are your thoughts and opinions on this practice? Does your firm assist startups with more than just financial matters, or do you feel it important that the startup be fully formed by the time you invest?

  2. Exit Strategy by blinder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my (very) limited experience in dealing with the VC world, one of the key concepts that was always in any discussion was the exit strategy. Typically that translated into IPO or sale to someone else. Is this any different with respect to open source companies?

    It just seems to me, and I'm just a knuckle-dragging developer here (who also engages in diy projects), that the exit strategies might be a bit different than your traditional concerns.

  3. Somewhat broad question by andyring · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Gorman,

    In general, what qualities in an open source project do you find attractive and worthy of consideration for venture capital?

  4. Common Failures by paulevans · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What are the most common problems that most startups have when begining talks with you?

    --
    "When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you." --leonstryker
  5. How did you get your job? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have graduate degrees and experience in engineering, and I have good managerial and interpersonal skills. I have often wondered what it would take to sit on the other side of the table, and what it is like to have plenty of funding, helping other people bring good ideas to market.

    How did you get your job? Is it hard, easy, boring, fascinating, soul-destroying, fulfilling, all of the above?

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  6. Why Open Source? by bit+trollent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why have you chosen to fund Open Source based companies?

    From a Venture Capitalist's point of view what advantages do open source based companies have over other software companies?

  7. CS and mgmt by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A masters in both CS and management? I'd love to see some of the arguments he gets into with himself...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  8. When do you pull out by cyborch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Given that the nature of venture capitalism is to fund startups, at what point do you pull out? Is there a critical size of a company which is a warning to pull out and cash in? If so, what size is it?

    To put it more precisely: When, in your opinion, does a startup stop being a startup, and do you pull out and cash in when that point is reached?

  9. Let's start with the basics... by psykocrime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Traditionally it's held that one of the things a company should have, if seeking venture capital, is "proprietary technology." Obviously in the
    case of an open-source company this will never hold. Open-Source based businesses are always fundamentally different from an old-school technology
    company in that you're not really selling bits; you're selling "something else" where the "something else" may vary depending on the business model.

    So given that, and the thesis (mine at least) that the barriers to entry for competition are lower for an open-source company, what do you look for
    in a potential investment? Are you looking for some radically new and innovative business model; with accompanying patent? Or is it all
    about execution, suggesting that a would-be open-source company has to meet a higher standard in terms of attracting business and establishing
    a customer base *before* getting funded?

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  10. Prevent getting thrown out of my own startup? by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    More than once, I've seen the founder of a startup get thrown out of his own company by venture capitalists, despite the fact that it was his idea and technology in the first place. How do I structure a VC deal so that I can't be kicked out of my own company?

    Crow T. Trollbot

  11. First on my mind by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What are the best ways to actually earn a profit, when you're giving away the source code? Are entrepreneurs in this area limited to "support, support, support", or are there other ways?

  12. 10 Most common by Anon-Admin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In your opinion, what are the 10 most common mistakes open source-based startups make when seeking venture capitol?

  13. Financing / Control Questions by grondak · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I realize the answers to these questions vary by project, but let's say we have a pretty hot idea and the only contribution is the software IP. Let's say it's a web site. We've got something working but need money for a production deployment (ie bandwidth, systems hosting, customer service reps, support staff, etc. In short, our cost model can look like PayPal's cost model).
    1. What amount of control (ie % ownership) typically goes to the investors? 90% ?
    2. How is the VC money returned to the investors? Examples: is it given back as percentage of profit (20 % of gross or NIAT), or like a loan (all returned within 5 years?) or is it in perpetuity (VCs get 20% of everything, forever) ?
    3. Does risk still equal reward? Seems to me the reward in the Internet/OSS project space is outrageously high, but the risk can't get any greater than the money you lay out + potential loss of goodwill/reputation.
    4. What's the percentage in item 2 that VCs actually get for a project like this? 20%?
    --
    [Error 407: No signature found]
  14. When to seek VC, when to bootstrap? by b0r1s · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having started a small website, that quickly turned into a medium sized website, that led to mentions in Private Equity Weekly, calls from Turner, speaking engagements, and emails from a couple Investment Banking firms, at what point should a startup seek outside funding vs. trying to bootstrap their way to success? We wanted to carry it as long as we could (we're not losing money, we can afford to run at this level forever), but we have since been equaled (or, in some cases passed) by a dozen or so copycats with big bankrolls funding their marketing and PR.

    At this point, it feels like we've missed the boat (though our traffic and membership is higher than ever before), simply because we didn't take on the outside management and marketting expertise that would have come with real funding.

    The question, then, is: does there exist a fundamental 'right time' to contact a VC/IB to avoid losing your competitive edge? Or, does it always vary by company?

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android