Slashdot Mirror


GMail and Sourceforge E-mail Bouncing Saga

An anonymous reader writes "All e-mail going back and forth from Sourceforge and Gmail is being bounced. This leaves many Open Source projects with helpless mailing lists. Fortunately, Sourceforge blames Google and Google is blaming SourceForge for this. The Sourceforge support site is clogged with support requests for a resolution to this problem. Google's response to this bouncing has been automated e-mails saying it is probably at the other end of mail delivery. This is something that the community needs to know about since it has been going on for a week already with no end in sight." Worth noting that Sourceforge and Slashdot are both part of OSTG. Update 20:07 GMT by SM: According to SourceForge support staff this issue is now resolved. Apparently a few days ago the sender-verify to gmail started resulting in 450 errors. Google has since either corrected this issue or whitelisted SourceForge and several tests of the system have resulted in correct delivery.

30 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Sourforge? by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Funny
    Worth noting that Sourforge and Slashdot are both part of OSTG.
    After all the great software I've found on there, I'd call it sweetforge.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Sourforge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      After all the great software I've found on there

      Yes, it's so useful to have a choice of 13,237 window managers. Linux just won't be ready for the desktop until we have at least 187,467 window managers, each using its own widget-libraries.

  2. Loss of communication can only mean one thing... by photozz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Invasion.

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
  3. Re:Loss of communication can only mean one thing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new e-mail bouncing, blame placing, invading overlords!

  4. Umm by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fortunately, Sourceforge blames Google and Google is blaming SourceForge for this.


    I don't think that word means what you think it means. Unless you are glad that no one is willing to take responsibility for the problem and fix it???

    1. Re:Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello, I'm sarcasm, I don't believe we've met before.

    2. Re:Umm by Ravensfire · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you need to turn on your Sarcasm Detector (TM)(Patent Pending).

      -- Ravensfire

      --
      "But we decide which is right, and which is an illusion"
    3. Re:Umm by onion2k · · Score: 4, Funny

      A sarcasm detector? Like that'd be useful.

    4. Re:Umm by narzy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would find such a device highly useful. I am one of many people who find it hard to differentiate sarcasm from strait forward conver...wait a minute...

    5. Re:Umm by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny
      A sarcasm detector? Like that'd be useful.


      I think it would, because many people don't recognize it when they see it.
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      Hello, I'm sarcasm, I don't believe we've met before.
      Hello, I'm a lame joke. I spend a lot of time at Slashdot.
    7. Re:Umm by Lurker187 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But this is /., so what we really need is a device that detects a LACK of sarcasm. After all, you don't want to spend your whole gadget budget on batteries, do you?

      --
      [command INSERTWITTYQUIP failed: insufficient wit]
    8. Re:Umm by DCstewieG · · Score: 2, Funny

      You seem to hang out here a lot. Maybe you should register.

  5. I don't see the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you all have the source code, and the developers do not consider this a priority, so feel free to solve your problem and post a patch

  6. eh by erikdotla · · Score: 3, Funny

    Troubleshooting IT on message boards involving the public is a highly effective way to get things done.

    Allow me to start. *ahem*

    WHY is SourceForge even using SMTP????!!!

    --
    # Erik
    1. Re:eh by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because X.400 isn't as widely accepted yet ;-)

      What we REALLY need is a full OSI protocol stack build on top of TCP/IP so we can use all the wonderful features of X.400, X.500 (instead of messy LDAP), and so forth!

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:eh by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because X.400 isn't at all accepted, anywhere, and never was ;-)

      There, corrected that typo for you.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  7. Open Source vs. Google by patio11 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who is the Slashdotter to root for? Hmm... I know, third option! It is Microsoft's fault!

  8. Re:Loss of communication can only mean one thing.. by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

    They don't have a "+1 Nerd Movie Quotes" mod, sorry. :)

  9. Google's Answer if they find it is them... by tecker · · Score: 5, Funny
    Original Response:
    Google's response to this bouncing has been automated e-mails saying it is probably at the other end of mail delivery.
    New Response:
    "Well Gmail is still in beta so don't blame us."
    --
    Procrastinating life a way at a rapid rate of speed.
  10. Re:Loss of communication can only mean one thing.. by roger6106 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since all email is being bounced does this mean that it is an endless snowball effect with more and more emails being bounced back and forth?

    Who will have the last server standing? Google or Sourceforge?

  11. Re:Loss of communication can only mean one thing.. by bobtheinsanecow · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia the emails... arrrhhg!a;ughvo89hg804oithj9p0

    --
    mmm... chicken...
  12. Re:Loss of communication can only mean one thing.. by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Funny

    no... Yahoo!

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  13. Re:Not Google's only screwup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You're a moron. Go post on some other site.

  14. Re:Umm - Oblig. Reply by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lisa: Dad, do you know what Schadenfreude is?

    Homer: No, I do not know what shaden-frawde is. [sarcasm] Please tell me, because I'm dying to know.

    Lisa: It's a German term for `shameful joy', taking pleasure in the suffering of others.

    Homer: Oh, come on Lisa. I'm just glad to see him fall flat on his butt! [getting mad] He's usually all happy and comfortable, and surrounded by loved ones, and it makes me feel... What's the opposite of that shameful joy thing of yours?

    Lisa: [nastily] Sour grapes.

    Homer: Boy, those Germans have a word for everything!

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  15. Re:Not Google's only screwup by bstempi · · Score: 3, Funny
    Google AsSense

    So, is that Google's way of diagnosing hemroids, or of helping you find gay blind dates?

  16. Re:well this looks clear as mud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps all RFC's shoudl work like this, I mean shit, I can make a whole busienss model out of programminn things that, while not 'technically' correct, seem to work.

    Leave Internet Explorer out of this...

  17. Re:well this looks clear as mud by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps all RFC's shoudl work like this, I mean shit, I can make a whole busienss model out of programminn things that, while not 'technically' correct, seem to work.

    Sounds like Microsofts business model. :)

  18. Re:Loss of communication can only mean one thing.. by caseydk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm... take down one of the biggest Open Source Software repositories and the biggest search engine?

    This must be the work of Microsoft!

    Now how can we fit Haliburton into this?

  19. Re:its most likely sourceforge thats at fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Okay, it's some full grown adults in a basement then.