Slashdot Mirror


Google in Talks to Buy YouTube

tessaiga writes "The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Google is in talks to buy YouTube for about $1.6 billion. YouTube users watch more that 100 million videos daily, and the site's market share tops that of similar services offered by Google and other popular Web sites. This comes after a story earlier this morning that co-founder Sergey Brin is pushing for Google to cut back on the volume of products being offered, complaining that 'I was getting lost in the sheer volume of the products we were releasing'. Guess Google Video is one of the products making the approved shortlist."

15 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. I don't understand why they need to. by celardore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely they'd only be buying the YouTube name. Google has way more hardware, and an already succesful video product out there. Maybe they are trying to eliminate the competition, and get the ad revenue all for themselves. Is YouTube really worth that much to them though?

  2. Well by valkabo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its funny how every day the lines between google and microsoft blur. If microsoft tried this an unholy hell would be released..

  3. It makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google Video is probably the first example that comes to mind of the emergent Yet Another Half-Baked Google Technology phenomenon. By buying YouTube, they get a best-of-breed player on their side without diverting more in-house R&D resources. Given their (Google's) cash reserves, it's the right thing to do.

  4. Yeah... by CheeseburgerBrown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's amazing how not sucking works wonders for the way people interpret your actions and qualify the possible repercussions.

    1. Re:Yeah... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      MS-DOS didn't suck too badly compared to CP/M.

      Xenix didn't such compared to other UNIXes.

      OS/2 didn't suck, and neither did Windows NT next to desktop UNIX or DR-DOS+GEM

      Microsoft Word 2 didn't suck next to any of its competition.

      Microsoft have released more products that don't suck than Google (although, to be fair, I suspect most of us have been forced to use more of the ones that do suck). Google search has gone downhill a lot in recent months; I'm frequently finding searches fail to return any useful information, or if they do it's buried on page 3-4 of the results. Google is a young company, and they haven't had the time to screw up as badly as MS yet.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Yeah... by kwerle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MS-DOS didn't suck too badly compared to CP/M.

      But it did suck compared to some of the multitasking DOS clones.

      Xenix didn't such compared to other UNIXes.

      Not sure on the timeframe or truth of that. Wasn't I using Dynix back in the day, and was that better than Xenix? I just don't know.

      OS/2 didn't suck, and neither did Windows NT next to desktop UNIX or DR-DOS+GEM

      Compared to NeXTstep, they all sucked. (OpenStep by the time NT came out)

      Microsoft Word 2 didn't suck next to any of its competition.

      When was WordPerfect released?

      Microsoft have released more products that don't suck than Google (although, to be fair, I suspect most of us have been forced to use more of the ones that do suck). ... Google is a young company, and they haven't had the time to screw up as badly as MS yet.

      Here is something Google has not done that Microsoft constantly has: squash competition through marketshare AND incompatability. To be fair, Google has to work with the 800lb gorilla in terms of file formats and the like.

      If Microsoft were buying youtube, the countdown would being as to when they stopped supporting any playback except Windows Media Player. And then they would make it WMP Vista, which would force you to upgrade. With Google, you just don't imagine that happening.

  5. Only a moron... by patrixmyth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gotta love the related story on this one. Only a moron would buy Youtube, indeed.

    YouTube links are the only "You gotta see this." links that I get that I actually open on occassion. I think Google is making a great move here, if it's true. Given the other recent story about Google allowing google home page elements to be posted in websites, YouTube is a natural eyeball catcher to pull in people off personal websites.

    --
    "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
  6. Yeah, right. by merreborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How'd that yahoo-facebook deal go? Not a single verification of the story in 2 weeks?

    Whaddya know. Not all rumors are true. Last time, it was 'industry executives', this time it's 'a person familiar with the matter'.

  7. Re:But they couldn't solve our puzzles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is this 'funny'? 'Insightful' is more like it. Youtube is a piece of technological crap, yet it meets a social need. Much like MySpace. And both are wildly popular. Yet Slashdot persists in its belief that programming is the center of the universe.

  8. Re:Google's a moron? by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I didn't expect that!

    Well you still shouldn't -- while it might come to pass, I'd take this story with a massive grain of salt (mountain sized). The story comes from one unnamed individual, and is then circulated by some people that have a long history of rumors that didn't come to pass.
  9. Re:But they couldn't solve our puzzles! by rednip · · Score: 4, Insightful
    who are these teenagers that have all day to kick people in their crotch
    uh, These guys
    I'm hoping one of these days people will realize, just like Tamagotchies, pet rocks and the Tubthumping song, that the only reason sites like YouTube and MySpace prevade culture are because they're popular. It has nothing to do with great content or inherently good design.
    Tell that to Craig's list as well. It's not 'how pretty', or 'technically advanced' a website is but how many people look at it, and how many people use it for what they want to present, even if it most of it isn't great, some stuff does shine (or at least funny as hell). Sure there are technical problems with YouTube, but they have the eyeballs, and the Google engineers should be able to fix it up quicker than anyone else.
    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  10. Am i the only one who thinks this makes sense? by sam991 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google video may be the technically superior service, but it is almost completely lacking in social interaction. Youtube encourages you to have a vlog, to post video responses etc. Google video (at least from the standpoint of a Youtube user) is a little cold.

    Google may well have the hardware, but they've a lot to learn about what makes a site popular. Myspace has to be one of the ugliest sites around yet its popularity is ever soaring because it is social. Google video just is not.

    At the end of the day, Youtube is synonymous with the online video hosting/sharing community and that is what Google are paying £850 million for. That and the ability to integrate with existing Google products (Google calendar & vlog combined? That's some powerful stuff right there.)

    --
    "No, no, no, don't tug on that! You never know what it might be attached to."
  11. Re:The new name. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lol. Goo in my first language means "shit". So how would you like to view shittube?

    I already have a television, thanks.

  12. Uh oh.. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google look like their joining that happy band of companies that grew so big and had so much cash burning a hole in their pocket that they started buying insane companies for insane prices.
    1. Invent Google algorithm
    2. Invent Adsense
    3. Profit!
    4. Profit!
    5. Buy loss making company for huge amount of money
    6. No more profit!

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  13. Good for Apple? by Xyde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weren't there some (probably unsubstantiated) rumors floating around about iTV having direct access to Google Video? If so, Steve must be rubbing his hands together in glee about this. :)