Slashdot Mirror


IE Market Share Drops to Lowest Level in Years

Cultural Mosaic writes "Browser market share figures for September were released yesterday, and the numbers showed a big dip for Internet Explorer, as it dropped to just 82.10%, its lowest market share figure in years. Ars Technica notes that 'it's no surprise that Internet Explorer has been losing ground steadily over the past couple of years. There have been no significant innovations in the browser since XP SP2 was released over two years ago, and most of those were security tweaks.' Firefox grew from 10.77% in June to 12.46% while Safari jumped to its highest figure ever, 3.53%. I wonder how the release of Firefox 2.0 and IE 7 later this month will change the game?"

7 of 386 comments (clear)

  1. How the new releases will affect market share by rel4x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IMHO, the new releases could be very good or very bad for Firefox. It all depends on if they fixed the common complaints about it. If it's not such a memory hog, and doesnt lock up after being open too long, I'd say it could solidify Firefox's user base. However, a lot of people I know are really fed up with that. I think that's it's largely an addiction to tabs that keeps them loyal. Since IE7, at least outwardly, emulates a lot of the positives of Firefox, they might convert back if these glitches arent fixed.

    --

    Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
  2. I feel IE is not working for me. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I feel IE works for vendors, merchants, hackers, etc. against me.

    I feel other browsers are my tool.

    That's why I use firefox.

    Microsoft really has gotten in bed with other merchants so much that I just don't trust them.

    Oh.. and there is also the relative lack of virus's and attacks on firefox.

    Plus... it will work still when I switch to linux finally.
    I have a long term goal of switching all my applications to ones that work anywhere so I won't be tied to windows.
    Obviously- Everquest isn't on that list but it's really the only thing keeping me on windows now.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  3. Not These Jokers Again by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this data from the same "Net Applications" company that never publishes their source data or even methodologies and was demonstrated to have factual errors and contradictions in the summaries of their reports? I mean I'm happy with a trend towards less IE use, but I'm not about to just take these people's word for it, especially from a marketing firm. Give us real data or shut the hell up guys.

  4. Re:Firefox probably won't increase by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IE7 does a pretty good job of "just working," too. And despite all of the developer's comments to the contrary, most end-users switched to Firefox for a very few reasons:

    1) it was the "cool", "edgy" thing to do
    2) it has tabbed browsing
    3) it was faster than IE.

    Well, IE7 takes care of 2 and 3. And time basically takes care of 1. I'm a web developer so I have most of the major players installed on most platforms. You know what? On my Windows box I end up using IE7. On OSX I use Safari. On Linux I use Firefox, but I don't do casual Linux work that much any more (even though it used to be my primary workstation). For actually using the web, I prefer Safari hands-down. Second place honestly on Windows would go to IE7 at this point. Its fast, does everything I want it to, and it "just works," whereas Firefox seems slower and has slightly more issues on the websites I personally happen to visit.

    Is this proof of anything? Not even close. But it does mean that, for most people, Firefox isn't the slam-dunk it used to be. Even when it comes to security, as long as you're comparing it to IE7 (although to be honest even with IE6 I never came across a security issue - but I don't go downloading HappySmileyFunPack(tm) either).

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  5. IE7 is Windows-only. by Kartoffel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IE7 is not a value-add for Vista. As a product bundled with Windows, IE7 only needs to be decent enough to keep ignorant consumers from seeking alternatives. How does Microsoft expect to make money with IE7?

    The marketshare for web browsing from a Windows PC is shrinking. I'm not just talking about Mac OS X and Linux. Realize that this is the year 2006. We snipe eBay auctions via mobile phone. We get RSS feeds on our PDAs. The people using the web these days are doing it less and less with desktops running Windows. I can't buy IE7 for Windows Mobile or Symbian. IE7 doesn't just fail to add value, it fails to compete at all.

  6. Re:I'd like to say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >>Nonsense - We have a small quantity of water in the glass, and it just had a few more drops added to it.

    The difference is that the dork that used to claim he didn't have to code to w3c standards used to spout that he covered 90% of the market doing things specificly for IE.
    It sounds pretty stupid now to say that your website is good enough if it works for only 82% of the public.

    Critical mass of coverage by someone to lazy to test on browsers other than IE always seemed to be around 90-95%
    We've already seen a huge change in how popular sites are designed in the last 2 years or so. My guess is that if IE were to drop down into the 70s, even the dumbest website desingers would have no choice but to test against multiple browsers.

  7. Re:Still using IE and don't intend to change by Asylumn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I have used IE6 for years and never once got a virus or spyware because of it.


    The problem is not users with a clue. If you can manage to use IE6 and not get infested with malware it's because you know what you are doing and you know what not to click. The average user does not. Keeping a system clean using IE6 requires a knowledgable user actively guarding against getting crap on your system.

    The problem is that most users do not possess the knowledge required to use IE6 cleanly. That is why FF is good. It helps protects users who don't know how to protect themselves. If you can use IE without a problem then great, use it, but pretending that IE6 is safe to use for a general user is a bit of a stretch.

    There's also the small issue that FF just works better, but if you don't care about things like standards compliance and open source then it's just a matter of personal preference and there's no accounting for that. As a long-time FF user I don't understand how anyone could willfully choose to use IE but hey, diversity is what makes the world interesting right?

    Rambling on here more then I intended to, but my point is simply that yes, it is possible to run windows and IE and not become a malware infested zombie, but it takes effort and know-how, two things that the average user doesn't (and shouldn't need) to possess.