EU Rejects Spam Maker's Trademark Bid
kog777 writes "The producer of the canned pork product Spam has lost a bid to claim the word as a trademark for unsolicited e-mails. EU trademark officials rejected Hormel Foods Corp.'s appeal, dealing the company another setback in its struggle to prevent software companies from using the word 'spam' in their products, a practice it argued was diluting its brand name. The European Office of Trade Marks and Designs, noting that the vast majority of the hits yielded by a Google search for the word made no reference to the food, said that 'the most evident meaning of the term SPAM for the consumers ... will certainly be unsolicited, usually commercial e-mail, rather than a designation for canned spicy ham.'"
...damn vikings.
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
Presidential elections?
$30 Off All Plans: Use code TRIPLESAWBUCK
The next time someone bitches about Apple protecting their iPod trademark, I'm just going to forward them a link to this article.
the most evident meaning of the term SPAM for the consumers ... will certainly be unsolicited, usually commercial e-mail, rather than a designation for canned spicy ham.
I just want to know how to order breakfast correctly. The last time I asked for Spam spam spam spam spam spam ham eggs spam spam spam bacon and spam, I got 6 advertisements for Viagra and Cialis, 3 pleas for extraditing Nigerian capital, an offer to augment my anatomy and blueberry pancakes served with Raspberry syrup and 2 raw quail eggs.
Please help!!
Sincerely,
A Sad Spam Solicitor
"Ultimately, we are trying to avoid the day when the consuming public asks, 'Why would Hormel Foods name its product after junk e-mail?'"
- see-into-other-areas chose to name their product after Microsoft's Operating System?
These would be the same people that will ask why makers of glass-that-fits-into-buildings-to-allow-people-to
Get a grip, Hormel.
Summation 2
they'd rather eat cat feces, which smells the same but tastes slightly better.
How do you know?
Well I guess the Coca-Cola Corp now know where they stand should they wish to persue a line in "other" products called coke....
since when did Spam become spicy? i've always been aware of its' tempting ham/chicken/various pork products goodness...and who can deny the succulent self juices that the log o' love is wallowing in? i'll never forget that summer when me and young becky atkins had our first taste of the forbidden half-ham/half-buffalo/half-emu pork product...the slimy, meat jello sliding down our chins in the summer sun... but i regress... spam is not spicy, unless you dress it up in something hot and sexy!
You can understand why the company puts in so much effort to protect the good name though. After all Spam (Scattered Parts of Anonymous Mammals) is important to many people. Both Hawaii and Alaska love Spam. As has been noted about Alaska:
For more tasty info on the Simulated Pieces of Appalling Mutants see The Amazing and Fabulous Spam Site which includes a 300 DPI Scan of SPAM
a href="
It's funny to see how much effort the company puts into targeting the brand given that Spam is so important to
i've had lots of cats in my life
I've seen them all eat poo on many occasions
i've also seen dogs digging in my trash to snack on used kitty litter
i tried feeding spam to 4 of my cats a few years ago, 3 didnt even bother to taste it
1 ate it but threw up about an hour later
Not yet, it seems. The magic 8 ball is still more popular.
Or Porsche (Portia)?
And the winner is SPAM! By a landslide:
:-)
spam -email -filter: 233,000,000 results
hot dogs: 49,700,000 results
I love googlefight
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
Perhaps that's where their daughter was conceived?
"All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"
To everyone who's replied to my comment. I should have stated that Windows wasn't a generic term for an operating system until Microsoft trademarked it.
;)
That's what I was referring to, not the generic use of windows as a whole. Or as a hole, covered with glass.
As this whole discussion is related to a SPECIFIC use of a name as a trademark, I think some of you have been a little picky