IBM's Counterclaim 10 Outlines 5 Ways SCO's Wrong

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Sunday October 15, 2006 @05:06AM from the darlure-to-launch dept.

ColonelZen writes "My article at IPW reads: But, however slowly, the wheels of justice do grind on. The discovery phase of SCO v. IBM is now complete, and as per the court's schedule the time to raise Summary Judgment issues is now. And IBM has indeed raised them ... such that it is very possible that all of SCO's claims against IBM could wind up dismissed piecemeal in those motions. ... Yesterday, IBM's redacted memo in support of CC10 hit Pacer. ... This is 102 pages detailing five independent but overlapping, direct and powerfully detailed reasons why SCO's claims of Linux infringement against its code are nonsense."

1 of 121 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

First we kill the lawyers! by Anonymous Coward · 2006-10-15 05:38 · Score: 0, Offtopic

Very sad that european courts can deal with utterly absurd claims so very quickly in corporate cases (and have done so for SCO's), while the SCOX vs. IBM and SCOX vs. Novell still drag on even though by the judge's comments it's clear they know the thing is a farce.

Obviously you're not familiar with Jarndyce Vs. Jarndyce?