Slashdot Mirror


Dvorak on Windows Genuine Advantage

PadRacerExtreme writes "Vista includes the much maligned 'Genuine Advantage' layer inside, which ensures that your copy of the OS is legit. If you're running a non-validated copy you get no upgrades, no security protection, nothing. That's all well and good, but what happens if a cracker tweaks that Genuine Advantage layer for its own good? Dvorak sees a huge problem, just waiting to happen. What's the vulnerability?" From the article: "I suspect the policeman [WGA] will actually be hacked before the OS. It might actually be easier for the pirates to create a fake cop that constantly authenticates fake versions of Vista than it will be to create a Vista imitation that can pretend to be a legitimate version. There is some irony to that idea. But that's none of my concern. I'm more worried about some joker creating a virus or exploit that turns the good cop into a bad cop, and I can only imagine the destruction and hassle that will ensue."

4 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Sadly by Null+Perception · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dvorak's forecast of the future is often wrong.

    --
    Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
    1. Re:Sadly by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For once, John has gotten it right, even making a more detailed prediction than just "it'll probably be hacked". There are two good reasons (from a black hat perspective) to crack WGA:

      1. Make a bootleg copy look authentic.
      2. Make an authentic copy look bootleg.

      Figureing out how to do one means you have done at least 80-90% of the work to figure out the other. That's essentially twice the normal incentive to crack a Microsoft product. #1 has an obvious financial incentive, but #2 may have one too, if the cracker is willing to consider extortion or similar modes of funding. If the cracker is doing it just to spite MS and/or MS users, the same double whammy applies.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  2. Low-hanging fruits by overshoot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's always easier to make something do what it's supposed to do (even when it shouldn't) than it is to make it do something it's not designed for.

    For instance, chainsaws are designed to cut off limbs. Tree, human, what's the difference?

    WGA and successors are designed to disable Microsoft systems. OK, I'm sure that there are those who appreciate the help.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Low-hanging fruits by dsanfte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not the point. The point is that Microsoft has designed their OS with a single point of failure, and to top it all off, if anyone were to exploit that point of failure, the deafening ring of poetic justice would be heard the world over.

      WGA is a key to every Windows box on the planet and a giant club with which to beat Microsoft over the head if it's every hacked, and you can bet that's not going to go unnoticed by those with the capability to pull this off. It would be the hack of the freaking century.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb