U.S. Announces New Space Security Policy
hey! writes "The Bush administration has announced a new space security policy, which includes the statement that 'Consistent with this policy, the United States will preserve its rights, capabilities and freedom of action in space ... and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to U.S. national interests.'" More from the article: "Eisendrath, co-author of a forthcoming book, 'War in Heaven: Stopping an Arms Race in Outer Space Before It Is Too Late,' says the United States is wasting its time. 'Defense Secretary Rumsfeld says we need to protect against a 'space Pearl Harbor,'' he says. 'But we're still the dominant power there.'"
International treaties are just goddamned pieces of paper.
Space Pearl Harbor will be the best Ben Affleck movie ever
All your base are belong to us!
One day the toilets of the world will rise up... And I'm going to nuke them.
Sounds like we have a Death Star gap in the making!
Time to get busy constructing and training of personel. I got dibs on the planet destruction button.
Jupiter - you're going to be SO pwned!
A: "I own this"
B: "Own what? There's nothing there!"
My sincere hope - my challenge - is that those 90 percent will, in hopes of foiling my prediction, actually /read/ the text of the statement,.... Read the text, consider it, /then/ reply.
Heh heh, you're funny.... Read the text....
You do realize you're on Slashdot, right?
I guess the Iranian/N.Korean/Venezualan space station's gonna be put on hold for a while.
http://kitties.b-log.ca
Asked about how the United States could own a vacuum, the Bush administration spokesman said that "the President had been associated with a vacuum for many years."
This post does neither, because while the previous paragraph added to the signal side of the signal-to-noise ratio, in this one I'm simply calling you a knob. You knob.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
And more importantly, can it pop a military-sized tin of jiffypop?
FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
90 percent of the replies to this posting will be ignorant anti-Bush rhetoric regarding his plans to weaponize space
90% of the people who have uttered the phrase "anti-Bush rhetoric" are fat balding guys who think feminism is the reason they can't get laid.
Are you a fat balding undersexed Republican? How can you not be? Then why should I listen to anything you say?
I'll get -1 Troll for this, but I haven't "framed" this "debate" any less than you have. Then content of your post is nothing more than "All criticism of Bush is uninformed, emotional, and therefore, wrong."
Please don't add to the signal-to-noise ratio of the internet.
Got it. Up with noise! Down with signal!
You don't even need to read the headline or understand anything about this to criticize. Every right asserted by Bush to militarize space becomes available to Russia and China. This is either impotent posturing (remember when he said we were going to Mars?) or preparation for a conflict.
And on that note, ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE.