Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Announces New Space Security Policy

hey! writes "The Bush administration has announced a new space security policy, which includes the statement that 'Consistent with this policy, the United States will preserve its rights, capabilities and freedom of action in space ... and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to U.S. national interests.'" More from the article: "Eisendrath, co-author of a forthcoming book, 'War in Heaven: Stopping an Arms Race in Outer Space Before It Is Too Late,' says the United States is wasting its time. 'Defense Secretary Rumsfeld says we need to protect against a 'space Pearl Harbor,'' he says. 'But we're still the dominant power there.'"

4 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. It's a predictable policy by shogarth · · Score: 4, Informative

    For 50 years we've pretended that things were different in space; everyone would ignore national rivalries and history and stare with awe at the daring feats of cosmonauts and astronauts. It was a nice fantasy and flew in the face of reality. The Apollo missions grew out of a fear of sleeping "under a communist moon."

    Here's the reality check. The US Navy exists to do a few things:

    • Project power ashore (i.e. shoot and bomb things that don't float or fly)
    • Guarantee US access to sea lanes of control
    • Deny access to SLoCs to US enemies
    Both the US Air Force and US Navy have space commands and with good cause. Clearly access to orbit is as critical now as access to the seas were 100 years ago. It is in every nation's self-interest to guarantee its access to orbit. It's not much of a leap to get from there to seeing that having technologies to deny that access to enemies is a strategic advantage. How many lives (on either side of a conflict) might be saved by neutralizing an enemy's communications and recon satellites? It's a no-brainer policy. (Insert Bush joke here...)
  2. Re:Not that I think this is a good idea but... by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you believe what you just said, you're not only not a rocket scientist, but you have no idea how orbital mechanics works.

    While it's not impossible to put something in space in such a way that it always stays over a single point on the planet, there are very limited number orbits in which this can be achieved, and they are all directly above the equator.

    --
    Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
  3. Re:Fear & Hatred by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am afraid have drunk the koolaid yet again.
    1. The USSR tested and deployed anti-satellite weapons.
    2. The USSR armed manned space craft and I don't mean pistols for the crews for survival in case they came down outside the recovery zone.
    3. The USSR tested a fractional orbital bombardment system for the SS-9.

    So what the US is saying is simply this.
    They intend to develop systems that can
    a. take out anti-satellite systems that could be used to target US satellites.
    b. take out other countries spy satellites.

    Spreading fear of the US is a fun past time for many news services and government. They know that the US will not really harm them so they can try and act tough with no risk.

    Truth is China is already stated that they are going to develop space based weapon systems. The USSR/Russia has already developed space based weapons systems and deployed them. Only their current lack of money is keeping them from deploying them right now. Of course they might be selling them.

    The only big problem is making it public instead of keeping it a black program.

    Space was militarized back in the early 60s. ROSATs, Elint satellites, and optical satellites are all deadly weapons and they have been in use for over 40 years.
    So this is really worth about a yawn and a stretch as far as news. Makes nice scary headlines though.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. Several satellites in a Molniya orbit by everphilski · · Score: 4, Informative

    Several satellites (two would be good, three for optimal coverage if you need minimal angular divergence from the surface) in a Molniya orbit would provide coverage over a static point in space, not over the equator. For the vast majority of the orbit ( greater than 12 hours, 18 IIRC [it has been awhile since I've done orbital mechanics, I'm a missile guy]) the satellite is in clear view of the point. Russians have been using this technique for surveillance of American assets for decades. And yes, I am a Rocket Scientist.