Slashdot Mirror


Web Geniuses Or Web Dimwits?

ScribeCity writes "The Washington Post has a provocative piece about online experiments at identifying experts. One wonders when someone will come up with a truly effective formula for measuring human intelligence — or take a stab at doing so — that exploits all the stuff people are publishing online." From the article: "This wisdom of the crowd could be outsmarted by what Michael Arrington, editor of the TechCrunch blog, recently dubbed the 'wisdom of the few.' Sites like PicksPal rely on input from the masses chiefly as a venue for auditioning prospective experts, on the theory that these virtuosos could provide even more accurate information and predictions than the crowd. 'If you figure out which ones did the best and get rid of the ones who have no idea, you'd do even better. Distill it down to the people who really know,' Arrington said."

10 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Or... by jo42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just get a chimp to throw darts at the wall...

  2. Why didn't they test Slashdot? by garcia · · Score: 5, Funny

    In order to effectively determine the rate of experts vs. everyone else, you could simply scan through all previous Slashdot posts (while removing those prefaced by IANAL) and easily determine those that are experts.

    Make sure you are browsing at -1, *those* people are the real experts ;)

    1. Re:Why didn't they test Slashdot? by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bush is teh stupid!
      Can I get my mod points now?

  3. IANAL, but by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... you sound like you could be an expert.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  4. Re::o\ by supersnail · · Score: 3, Funny

    If about nothing he everything knew then truly the force would be with him!

    --
    Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
  5. Re:Perverse Incentives by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...and then disappear everyone who knows what they're doing, so you can hire clueless sycophants whose loyalty can be guaranteed.


    Ooh! Just like U.S. Federal Government! Good idea!
  6. Re:Simple by karlto · · Score: 4, Funny
    and it identifies experts.... maybe even political candidates

    I wasn't aware that it was possible to be both of those

  7. I thought Slashdot solved this problem already? by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't Slashdot solved this problem with their moderation scheme? Oh, wait, nevermind... that would mean "Karma Whores" would qualify as experts. Nevermind.

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
  8. Re:Different "intelligences" by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 2, Funny
    The standard breakdown is something like: * Linguistic intelligence * Logical-mathematical intelligence * Spatial intelligence * Bodily-Kinesthetic intelligence * Musical intelligence * Interpersonal intelligence * Intrapersonal intelligence * Naturalist intelligence


    Intelligence, you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    -Grey
  9. No, the cat does not "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Web Geniuses and Web Dimwits

    Don't you mean Webiniuses and Webimwits?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.