Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Opera to Start Phoning Home?

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the they-know-what's-good-for-you dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Near the end of a story about Opera's determination to stay in the game: 'Earlier this week, Opera announced an addition that will keep it in step with its rivals. Johan Borg, a developer working on the browser, said Tuesday in a blog that the next edition, Opera 9.1, will include beefed up anti-phishing and anti-fraud features. Rather than simply indicate that a site is secure with a notation in the address bar, Opera 9.1 will also query Opera-owned servers for information on any site visited. Those that Opera has identifies as fraudulent will be automatically blocked by the browser.'"

3 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. dont they all do this now? by Deathlizard · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know IE7 phones home, and fireefox 2 does too for anti-phishing. They both can also be disabled by the user.

    I don't see how this is any different than what MS or mozilla is doing. As long as it can be disabled by the user it should be ok.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Trojan exploits YOU!
  2. Does anyone read anymore? by scoobrs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does anyone bother reading before commenting anymore? The feature will be able to be switched off at will, even on a site-by-site basis, and they will toss out source IPs at Opera if you choose to use it. The main reason they do it this way instead of downloading lists like mozilla and IE is that lists can be obsolete and phishers can be onto promoting their next scam by the time the lists are updated on clients. Besides, Opera is in Norway and outside Department of Justice jurisdiction for spying requests. If you don't like it or are sophisticated enough that you don't need it, turn it off.

    --
    -Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety deserve neither. -Ben Franklin
  3. Re:secure...says opera? by sammydee · · Score: 5, Informative
    RTFA:

    "When you browse to a site you have not visited before, the browser sends a request for site information to our server. The requests contains the domain name of the site and a hash value of the URL. We don't send the full URL, but we need a fingerprint of the full URL in case you visit a dangerous page on a site that is otherwise harmless."

    It only sends a hash of the web address. It would be difficult to extrapolate the whole address from a hash.

    --
    This is how the loudness war is killing music.