Slashdot Mirror


Judge Rules In Favor Of Spamhaus

Waylon writes "U.S. District Judge Charles Kocoras has ruled in favor of The Spamhaus Project. e360 Insight responded on its homepage, saying the judge's ruling was 'a devastating loss of personal freedom for all U.S. citizens'. As opposed to shutting down a voluntary service which tries to mitigate the millions of unsolicited emails that e360 Insight pumps out every single day." From the article: "In his order, Judge Kocoras wrote that the relief e360insight sought is 'too broad to be warranted in this case' and that suspending the domain name would 'cut off all lawful online activities of Spamhaus, not just those that are in contravention' of the default judgment. He also called e360insight's motion one that 'does not correspond to the gravity of the offending conduct.'"

5 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Ruling against Spamhaus still stands... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

    The judge denied e360insight's motion to suspend the Spamhaus domain, but that doesn't mean the original ruling against Spamhaus was vacated. As far as I can tell, that still stands.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  2. Update on botnet spammer by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Marginally irrelevant, but good news on spam: Update on Jeanson James Ancheta, botnet spammer. The short version: he's now Federal inmate number 32392-112 at the California City Correctional Institution.

  3. Re:The straight dope by nuzak · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Lindtard, e360 insight lawyer

    Dave Linhardt is e360. It's a one-man shop. Just another ranting chickenboner -- you should have seen him carry on on NANAE. I can't wait to see him try to collect his precious judgement in a UK court.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  4. Re:Go to the source by 6031769 · · Score: 4, Informative

    And please, people, take care not to use their https server instead as that would not only use up extra CPU on their server but would also reveal that they're running RHEL and that some chopper has left the port open.

    --
    Burns: We're building a casino!
    McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
  5. Re:This ruling is PRO freedom of speech by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's high time I roll out the "what the 1st admendment actually says" talk ...

    1st admendment is to prevent the GOVERNMENT from abridging your right to speech/expression. I can tell you to get off my servers all I want. I can ask someone else to filter your access to my servers as well.

    The government CANNOT mandate that a filter be used however, but this is not the case here. ...

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.