Slashdot Mirror


Firefox 2.0 Posted a Day Early

A number of readers alerted us to the [link removed] day-early [accidental] posting of Firefox version 2.0. At this writing the top page at mozilla.com still doesn't mention its availability. One reader pointed us to [link removed] a mirror and another recommended a comprehensive review of Firefox 2.0, with many screenshots, over at mozillalinks.org. Update by RM: - links above removed at request of Mozilla release people. They asked us to link to this note instead. They're only asking us to wait until Tuesday Afternoon (U.S. Pacific Time) for the official 2.0 download, which isn't long. (Patience is a virtue, etc.)

6 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. pls wait 24 hours by jhermans · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For crying out loud ! Can't we just leave those Mozilla folks alone for a day, so that they can prepare the release. They have to post 38 different executables, and do a very last check to see if they actually work.

  2. Re:Language by Xemu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not use bittorrent for it's best legal use: downloading firefox!

    --
    Tell your friends about xenu.net
  3. word to this by thdexter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At this writing,
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
    and
    http://www.getfirefox.com/
    and
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/
    all only say Firefox 1.5. Come f-ing on, slashdot, after having jumped the gun several times on freebsd. do they really need emails from everyone that produces software saying "only announce things when they're really announced" before checking a single website or two to see if something's officially out?

    --
    I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
  4. Re:Language by The+Raven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To support Firefox. Why should I take the Mozilla Org's expensive bandwidth when I can torrent it, and use the mostly free bandwidth of 100 other peers.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
  5. Re:Actually it's 45.6 Mb by AJWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a filesize has no reason to be measured in power-of-two quantities.

    A filesize has lots of reasons to be measured in power-of-two quantities. If you don't think so, let us know which drives use powers-of-ten sector sizes and which filesystems read/write powers-of-ten block sizes.

    (The SI guys can take a hike. The computer industry has been using kilo, mega, etc for powers-of-two since they got away from decimal computers almost 50 years ago now. It was the disk drive marketing guys who started pre-empting that so that they could advertise their eg 95.37 MB drives as 100 MB.)

    --
    -- Alastair
  6. Re:OFFICIAL STATEMENT by Kelson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And yet, somehow, it seems like with every Firefox release, someone decides to link Slashdot straight to an FTP site before they've finished pushing everything out. Firefox 2 beta 2, Firefox 2 beta 1... I'm sure you can find more, but I don't feel like searching further.

    Given this track record, what would it take for Slashdot to do a little checking the next time someone submits a "Firefox X released!" story?