Slashdot Mirror


US Slips Again In Freedom of the Press Ranking

npwa writes to tell us Reporters Without Borders has released their annual worldwide press freedom index. While developing nations like Haiti and Mauritania continue to gain ground developed nations like France, Japan, and the US continue their downward spiral. From the article: "The United States (53rd) has fallen nine places since last year, after being in 17th position in the first year of the Index, in 2002. Relations between the media and the Bush administration sharply deteriorated after the president used the pretext of 'national security' to regard as suspicious any journalist who questioned his 'war on terrorism.' The zeal of federal courts which, unlike those in 33 US states, refuse to recognise the media's right not to reveal its sources, even threatens journalists whose investigations have no connection at all with terrorism."

8 of 989 comments (clear)

  1. Re:government control of media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a difference between government-funded and government-controlled media.
    The Finnish YLE, along with the BBC and others, is funded by the government (mostly through a specified tax on all TV sets), but the government do not control what they air. They set guidelines, but do not censor.

  2. Re:.. without BORDERS by SolitaryMan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Are they wanting reporters to be above the law or what?
    They don't expect anything. They count how many reporters have been killed, threated, imprisoned, oppresed etc. Lawfully or not is does not matter much for this index, because 1. Laws are different in different countries. This exactly how reporters are mostly oppressed: by inhumane laws. 2. If we try to apply some "universal law" for every case, the number of criminals among reporters will be uniformly distributed and will not affect the relative index.
    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  3. Re:government control of media? by Peregr1n · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems to be a common mistake that people outside of Britain think the BBC is government controlled. It isn't; in fact it's usually the first to be critical of the government.

    The BBC is THE most impartial news agency I know - part of their mandate is to be unbiased, and as there's no politically biased financiers, and no advertisers, they can be free to criticise anyone.

    It isn't funded by the government either; it is paid for by the license fee, which is mandatory for anyone with a TV set, which admittedly does imply some kind of state control, but if the government did try to interfere there would be a massive outcry.

    Put it this way: I'm British, and I'd take the BBC over any independant news agency financed by advertisers any day :-)

  4. Re:10 reasons why the US is hated all over the wor by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Informative

    And guess which country gives the most in money and food aid to feed those children...

    Based on per-capita giving, America is almost dead last among first-world nations.

  5. Re:Nebulous by Noryungi · · Score: 5, Informative
    Have these things been happening to US journalists? If they have not, and neither have journalists in the other high-ranking nations, then how is this ranking conducted? Isn't that like ranking all the students who made 100% on their tests?


    Take a look at this page, where you can find a list of attacks against freedom of the press, that were committed in, or by, the United States and its administration.



    You can agree -- or disagree -- with this list, but the fact is that there is a basis for the US low ranking.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  6. Re:10 reasons why the US is hated all over the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    The poster doesn't even stand a shot at naming a single country that gives everything it could to the poor countries around the world.

    how about 10 or 20 ?
    Economy Statistics > Economic aid > Donor (per $ GDP) by country
     
    #1 Denmark $8.23 per $1,000 of GDP
    #2 Luxembourg $7.57 per $1,000 of GDP
    #3 Netherlands $6.93 per $1,000 of GDP
    #4 Norway $5.60 per $1,000 of GDP
    #5 Sweden $4.91 per $1,000 of GDP
    #6 United Kingdom $3.69 per $1,000 of GDP
    #7 Ireland $3.31 per $1,000 of GDP
    #8 Lesotho $3.20 per $1,000 of GDP
    #9 Belgium $3.06 per $1,000 of GDP
    #10 Switzerland $3.06 per $1,000 of GDP
    ...
    #23 United States $0.59 per $1,000 of GDP
    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_eco_aid_don_ pergdp-economic-aid-donor-per-gdp

    enjoy

  7. Re:10 reasons why the US is hated all over the wor by damiangerous · · Score: 5, Informative
    I guess it depends on whose numbers you believe:

    Volunteering and giving as a share of GDP by country, including gifts to religious worship organizations where available, ca. 1995-2002

    All private philanthropy

    The Netherlands 4.95%
    Sweden * 4.03%
    United States 3.94%
    Tanzania 3.78%
    United Kingdom 3.70%
    Norway 3.42%
    France 3.21%
    Germany 2.56%
    Finland 2.43%
    Canada 2.40%

    http://www.jhu.edu/~cnp/pdf/comptable5_dec05.pdf
  8. Re:Until they want help. by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

    But when Katrina hit New Orleans, what other country (besides my Canada) offered aid or assistance to the US?

    From the first hit on google for "katrina international aid":

    Sue Pleming, "Foreign governments line up to help after Katrina," Reuters AlterNet, September 2, 2005: "The United Nations offered to help coordinate international relief efforts for the United States. ... The State Department said offers so far had come from Belgium, Canada, Russia, Japan, France, Germany, Britain, China, Australia, Jamaica, Honduras, Greece, Venezuela, the Organization of American States, NATO, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Greece, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Mexico, South Korea, Israel and the United Arab Emirates."