Slashdot Mirror


US Slips Again In Freedom of the Press Ranking

npwa writes to tell us Reporters Without Borders has released their annual worldwide press freedom index. While developing nations like Haiti and Mauritania continue to gain ground developed nations like France, Japan, and the US continue their downward spiral. From the article: "The United States (53rd) has fallen nine places since last year, after being in 17th position in the first year of the Index, in 2002. Relations between the media and the Bush administration sharply deteriorated after the president used the pretext of 'national security' to regard as suspicious any journalist who questioned his 'war on terrorism.' The zeal of federal courts which, unlike those in 33 US states, refuse to recognise the media's right not to reveal its sources, even threatens journalists whose investigations have no connection at all with terrorism."

5 of 989 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nebulous by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Am I the only one that finds their entire ranking system a bit nebulous?


    Simply read the following page, here they explain their methodology.



    Are they wanting reporters to be above the law or what? What does that have to do with their freedom to publish what they want?


    Nice troll. RSF simply assumes journalists should be granted the following rights:
    • Freedom not to reveal (or be pressured to reveal) their sources, in case the whistle-blower can lose life and limb because he spoke to a journalist.
    • Freedom of speech, just because saying 'Fush Buck' should not be cause enough to be sent to prison.
    • Freedom not to be bothered, investigated, spied upon, kicked or threatened by goons, just because they chose to exert their rights not to reveal their sources or their freedom of speech.


    As a side note: your comments clearly reveals your lack of understanding of even the most basic universal human rights.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  2. Re:Problem with this ranking by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "So if some islamist group threatens, say, danish journalists/cartoonists, the ranking of Danemark [sic] will go down."

    That's a good point, but if that group's power or ability to levy punishment is significant, I think it makes sense to include. The reason censorship is wrong is that it's a violence-based denial of free speech. Whether it's a government, para-government, mafia, or militant group is largely irrelevant to the overall problem: lack of freedom. Presumably, the ranking takes into account the severity of the threat involved.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  3. Re:What source is this? by sorak · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Please explain the logic behind your statement. How can possibly a humoristic show and a news TV station be comparable at all?
    A). Because the Daily Show is probably more informative and less biased than many so-called "news" shows, which are really just staged arguments by people who resort to ad-hominem attacks because it is more interesting than a thoughtful and informative debate on the topic. B). Because some of Fox News focuses on this "we are America, we are great, everybody loves us" non-sense (Oliver North's "War Stories", for example), which may not sell too well in foreign countries. It's like if a rock star shouted "no one rocks like detroit", and he was in Los Angeles. The crowd would hate it.
  4. Re:What source is this? by daem0n1x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, I'm European and I spent some time working in a project in the US. I watched Fox News every evening because it made me laugh a lot. It's completely ridiculous.

    We have some pretty bad journalists, and our media are very biased, you can tell right away most things are manipulated. But we couldn't get to the level of Fox News, it's too brazen, people just wouldn't take it seriously.

    Of course, if some Americans take the Fox crap seriously, it ceases to be funny, it becomes very, very dangerous.

  5. Re:10 reasons why the US is hated all over the wor by speculatrix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I heard this story about an American who visited once

    I have travelled to 25 countries round the world, to USA many times, spanning four continents. I many many cases I have seen people treat Americans obsequiously, in a transparently patronising manner, because of their wealth, and yet the moment the American is gone the hatred is clear. In one country, I was with a group of tourists, with an American party, and only once I said I was English not American did the non-Americans even acknowledge my existence. I have noticed Canadians explain the same and seen an instant change of attitude.

    If you're American, and offended, don't be - just remind yourself that yours is NOT the only way of life, and that the people who represent you both formally and informally on the world's stage do NOT give a very good impression, and that maybe it's about time you made your gov't accountable to the people, and put a stop to the corruption and crap dished out. Even Condy Rice admitted that the USA's stance on Iraq has been a disaster.