Slashdot Mirror


Male Blood Elves Get Pumped Up

Kotaku reports that the Male Blood Elves, from the upcoming World of Warcraft expansion Burning Crusade, have been made more masculine by their Blizzard overseers. Which totally makes sense, because when I think elves I think paragons of masculinity. From the article: "You changed it because your constituency is a bunch of capslock-riding asshats who are threatened by bishy player characters. The reason Blood Elves were Horde in the first place is because everyone was whining about all the Horde races being ugly juggernauts. The point of Blood Elves was to inject some swish into a very physically intimidating set of races. They're not exactly chunky now, and I do not begrudge a game company making prerelease aesthetic changes, but their reasons for doing so are pathetic. " Before and after photos are available in their post.

6 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. "Some swish"? by Canthros · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Bishy"?

    Are we reading the rantings of some crazed slash-fiction writer? This has to be the most mind-numbingly stupid objection to a change that I've ever heard.

    --
    Canthros
  2. *CLICK* by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    *CLICK*

    That's the sound of the WoW playerbase not giving a damn and picking whatever race gives them the best bonuses for their class. While I love Kotaku, this honestly strikes me as one of the whiniest posts I've ever read on there. Boo hoo, Blizzard "nerfed" the character model by making it buffer. While I think its high time Blizzard enable characters to alter more of their physical appearance similar to City of Heroes, I have to wonder...is this really worth posting on the front page of Slashdot?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  3. "constituency"? by ObjetDart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's an interesting euphemism for "customers".

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
  4. Re:congratulations, blizzard by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is this news?

    Because it is so much more "news for nerds" than the info Apple posted about adding application signing, mandatory access controls, resolution independence, OpenGL 2.1, and automatic threading to use multiple cores for single threaded OpenGL applications in Leopard, that I submitted and had rejected yesterday.

  5. Re:congratulations, blizzard by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately many more people find this minor tidbit of information more interesting and relevant than a tedious discussion about program controls for a minor platform.

    A less hostile way of stating it is: to appeal to the masses you need to aim for the median, to appeal to the specialists you need to be specific.

    If you're uninterested in gaming content, you can unsubscribe from that channel in Slashdot.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  6. Re:SWG had a nice system by tourvil · · Score: 4, Insightful
    SWG had a much more diverse feel.

    Yes it did. It also lagged all to hell when you were in a slightly populated area. I wish WoW was more customizable too, but I think they did that on purpose to reduce the amount of character info that needed to be passed around to other players.