Slashdot Mirror


New Campaign Tactic - Google Bombing

jeian writes "My Direct Democracy, a liberal group blog, is trying out a new campaign tactic — Google bombing. From the New York Times article: 'Searching Google for Peter King, the Republican congressman from Long Island, would bring up a link to a Newsday article headlined King Endorses Ethnic Profiling.' Google's policy has typically been to not intervene and let the algorithms work by themselves, but could this change if Google-bombing becomes a common tactic?"

4 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. This is why... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is why I don't listen to radio or watch television during election season.

    One might assume for the same reasons I might now stop surfing the net, but I won't for the simple reason I don't know anything about anybody or any proposition. I'll figure it all out the hours before I vote.

    For those who trust the internet for information, you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. You must be cautious.

    this is not the candidate candidate you should be voting for...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Classic Google-bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm surprised that no one has mentioned one of my personal favorite google-bombs...
    Google for Santorum (as in Rick Santorum) and you will see the funniest ever.

  3. Re:Miserable Failure is the classic example by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Funny
    Once a particular Google bomb gets noticed and talked about on the Web, that discussion of the Google bomb itself serves to help...

    The first rule of the Google bomb: you must talk about the bomb.
    The second rule of the Google bomb: you MUST talk about the BOMB.
  4. Well, if you insist... by shrubya · · Score: 5, Funny
    you MUST talk about the BOMB
    In AD 2006,
    campaign was beginning.
    Peter King: What happen ?
    IT guy: Somebody set us up the Googlebomb.
    Secretary: We get Newsday.
    Peter King: What !

    . . . So, have you had enough, or must I continue?