For AMD Success Means Problems
An anonymous reader writes "AMD's success with its dual-core Opteron and Athlon processors has created something of a happy problem for the company. It can't make its products fast enough to meet demand. Just the same, with the Intel price war heating up and new 65-nanometer manufacturing technology being implemented in its factories, AMD has a lot of balls in the air right now." From the News.com article: "AMD's current pickle is the result of its success, which makes it a little easier to swallow for company executives. Demand is high, but the company's dual-core processors still use its 90-nanometer manufacturing technology. Intel's chips, on the other hand, are built using the smaller transistors provided by its 65-nanometer manufacturing technology. Not only is AMD using larger transistors, but its dual-core Opteron and Athlon 64 processors contain two processing cores integrated onto a single piece of silicon, or a die. This design has given AMD great performance during the past few years, but resulted in processors that were almost twice the size of its single-core chips."
I hate it when my balls are in the air.
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
From the News.com article: "AMD's current pickle ..."
Well, *No wonder* AMD is having problems... they should NOT be making pickles, they should be making chips!
TDz.
It's better than Intel's Pentium problem. They simply couldn't do the math!
Q: Why did they call it a Pentium instead of 586.
A: When they booted up the first Pentium and added 100 to 486, it answered 585.32752365107239874
Have you read my journal today?
Symboligy? I think the word you're looking for is "symbolism"
He lost me at "falic".
[putting on clownish AMD fanboy hat just for fun]
"At what point does the die become defective enough that they ship it to Intel to be a Pentium IV?"
[rim-shot]