Slashdot Mirror


Judge Says RIAA Can't Have Hard Drive

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "A Texas judge has refused to allow the RIAA untrammelled access to the defendant's hard drive in SONY v. Arellanes. The court ruled that only a mutually agreeable, neutral computer forensics expert may examine the hard drive, at the RIAA's expense, and that the parties must agree on mutually acceptable provisions for confidentiality."

15 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Defendant's terms by Firehed · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Okay, you guys can have the music back. Just let me keep the pr0n!"

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  2. Re:This sounds like a good precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll stick the RIAA with something hard....

  3. All this means... by posterlogo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is that you pr0n collection is potentially safe from scrutiny. Can you just imagine if those RIAA people could tell the media how music pirating and pornaholics go hand in hand?

    1. Re:All this means... by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Funny
      Can you just imagine if those RIAA people could tell the media how music pirating and pornaholics go hand in hand?
      Why you think the net was born?
    2. Re:All this means... by risk+one · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you're forgetting that a computer expert will be examining the hard disk. There'll be plenty of scrutinizing going on with that porn collection.

  4. An Easy Win Here Would Be... by punxking · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a a mutually agreeable, neutral computer forensics expert, my only acceptable choice is CowboyNeal.

    --
    You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
  5. Re:Money can't buy love... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Buy/Pay-off "neutral expert"
    2) Resume "business" as normal
    3) ???
    4) Profit!


    5) Money trail is uncovered by journalist/FBI/whatever
    6) ???
    7) Prison!

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  6. definition of expert: by jtwronski · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they ever try to nail me (not that they'd have a reason to), I'll make sure that my linux box is only examined by a well-trained MCSE with lots of experience with the ntfs and fat32 filesystems.

        In reality, I could always do a checksum of my partitions, and see what the checksum is when the drive gets back from the RIAA's expert evidence installer guy. I'd fear a real expert more that I'd fear the RIAA shill doing it.

  7. Re:this means nothing by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 3, Funny

    It coul mean the RIAA can have only the information relevant to their lawsuit.

    I wonder if that means they have to basically play "Go Fish" now.

    Sony: "Do you have any Christina Aguilera?"

    Neutral guy: "Go Fish!"

  8. Stipulations by Debug0x2a · · Score: 2, Funny

    Stipulation #1: They must listen to EVERY SONG IN ITS ENTIRETY to make sure its not a legal demo copy with that damned message at random points. Stipulation #2: They must preview EVERY MEDIA FILE (Including horse porn) IN ITS ENTIRETY to insure that there is no copyright infringement there such as music videos or demo images. Stipulation #3: They must reference EVERY SONG 'illegally obtained' with a list of music legally owned by all users, past and present, of the hard drive, including the manufacturers and the techies at Dell. Oh, and the company charges at least $120/hour for the service... hope they like to spend their money on guys watching horse porn.

    --
    First post = troll. Cleverly worded post designed to enrage others = flamebait.
  9. Re:This sounds like a good precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... duck season! FIRE!

  10. Re:Money can't buy love... by Firehed · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's money buying "love" if I've ever heard of it.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  11. Re:Precedent - Probable Cause? by rHBa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right, that's decided it then, I'll keep using the neighbours wirless ;-)

  12. Re:Precedent - Probable Cause? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is why when they request a "mirror" of the harddrive you give them a "mirror." You go out an buy a new harddrive that matchs the one that you are going to have to cough up. After you clean off the master, then you copy each file over with the copy command. Make sure you use the archive option so it copies the correct file date and permissions.

    There, they have thier mirror that they requested. There are no "holes" in the file table because there where never any incriminating files on the drive to start with. Just to make things interesting write a script that will copy and delete random files. Get the fucker good and fragmented, then defrag the son of a bitch. If you got some real balls then encrypt the fucker, use the windows encryption shit. Its weak enough to be cracked but strong enough to be annoying.

    If you are really brave use strong encryption and use the password "go fuck yourself." When they order you to cough over the password you can give it to them and tell them what to do with it.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  13. Re:This sounds like a good precedent by scotch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did somebody steal something?

    --
    XML causes global warming.