Slashdot Mirror


Honeybee Genome Sequenced

mapkinase writes to let us know about articles in Nature on the completed sequencing of the honeybee genome. From the first article: "Two other insects have already been sequenced: the malaria-carrying mosquito Anopheles gambiae, and one of science's great model organisms, the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. Like these, the bee is much easier to manipulate and study than, say, the monkey. But unlike the mosquito and the fruitfly, the bee's social behavior is of special interest." Another article in the same issue clarifies why this sequencing is important: "The genome is helping to reveal some of those [such as the bees' dance language and the division of labor in the hive] mechanisms. For instance, there are 65 spots in the genome that seem to code for short RNA molecules called microRNAs (miRNAs), molecular switches that can turn genes on or off. The researchers found that miRNA activity differs between bees doing different jobs."

20 of 67 comments (clear)

  1. miRNA? by Iron+(III)+Chloride · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting that miRNA could be turned off and on. These play a role in helping dicer form the RISC, so I wonder what this may lead to, not only in terms of info on honeybee's social behavior, but RNAi.

    --
    Cogito, ergo sum, fosho!
    1. Re:miRNA? by Tatarize · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's neat to find, but it had to be there. Each bee has the same core DNA. The drones and queen and each sub variety of bee all use the same DNA. For the geeks in the audience who aren't bio-geeks as well.

      Make Wings;
      Make Thorax;
      Make Head;
      Size = 10;
      if (Bee == Queen){//miRNA
              Size = 30;
              Behavior = "Go around laying eggs";
      }
      else {
              Size = 10;
              Behavior = "Go around gathering honey";
      }

      Give or take. miRNA goes around turning off certain gene stuff. I'm too lazy to RTFA, but I'd like to know the relationship between miRNA and royal jelly.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    2. Re:miRNA? by MikShapi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not exactly. More like:

      Make Wings;
      Make Thorax;
      Make Head;
      Size = 10;
      if (GrowthStoppingHormonePresent == false){
                      Size+=20;
                      if (OtherQueenPresent == true){kill it;}
                      Spray Growth Stopping Hormone On All Bees Around You;
      }
      else
      {
                      Behavior = "Go around gathering honey";
      }

      --
      -
  2. How cool. by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet this creates quite a buzz among genome researchers.

    1. Re:How cool. by Renfield+Spiffioso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, they'll have plenty of information to comb through.

  3. softICE, anyone? by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it just me, or does the whole DNA/Genome decoding process sound like rather complex dis-assembly project? Every living thing on this planet is nothing but a quad-nary based executable with VERY VERY good error-correction duplication.

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:softICE, anyone? by Nigel+Stepp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, it's much worse than that. Imagine if the opcode for ADD, say, would add to BX if it were after a JMP, but to AX if it were after a MOV.

      Many of the features of biology are context dependent, which makes predicative analysis quite difficult.

      --
      4096R/EF7BAFA6 79E1 DF98 D09D 898F 9A11 F6F0 DDDC 23FA EF7B AFA6
    2. Re:softICE, anyone? by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very RY VERY good error-correction duplication

      Uhh. ohhh. quite the opposite. Error correction is very bad (by IT standards at least) -that is how actually things evolve (since there is no mechanism for modification except mutation - which is an error). On average every single cell in human body has at least one error. Granted absolute majority of them are insignificant (since they happen on non functioning parts of code for this cell) .

        Living organism are quite a freaking mess from engineer's point of view. -Heck that's what you get if you launch a very shoddy evolutionary algorithm and run it for a couple of hundred millions of years.

    3. Re:softICE, anyone? by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 3, Funny

      Considering the number of live sacrifices I had to make to ensure the success of my last x86 project, yes, I'd say that sounds reasonable.

    4. Re:softICE, anyone? by valis · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Everything DNA related, shares a common encoding scheme

      Not so sure about that. The encoding of amino acids in genes is quite well defined (though there are exceptions, such as selenocysteine which is produced when a signal in the 3' UTR changes the meaning of a stop codon).

      And protein coding sequences only make up about 1.5% of the genome for humans. Other things in DNA are much less clear, everything in biology is stochastic. Many functional elements are directly involved in protein-DNA interactions where structure is more important than specific sequence. And not everything DNA related is in the genetic code. Positions of histones, DNA methylation, and other signals might be important.

  4. honeybees are very cool by myc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    besides their social behavior, there is a lot known about how the navigation system of honeybees works (i.e., how they find the hive after foraging). Understanding honeybee genetics could have an impact on understanding and designing autonomous systems for robotics.

    --
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:honeybees are very cool by w33t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, design of future machines, if it follows Kurtzweil's GNR (Genetics, Nanotech, Robotics) predictions, could very well be genetically modified at nano scale, creations endowed with artificial intelligence.

      I could see the use of a self-replicating macromolecule (if not DNA, then like it) to code for proteins or some other material.

      Genome sequencing seems akin to early (and current) physicists work at discovering and defining the periodic table of elements.

    2. Re:honeybees are very cool by edschurr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Another cool thing about them is that two genes exist in some groups of honey bee which helps them fight a disease that affects larvae. The first gene causes* them to remove the wax covering the diseased larvae, and the second causes* them to toss the larvae out of the nest to die. Groups of honey bees that only have the first gene will remove the wax and leave it at that. However, it's apparantly more complex than two genes causing behaviour because some honey bees do it without those genes.

      Well, that's how I remember it from The Selfish Gene by Dawkins.

      * perhaps not completely

  5. Reuters Error by saviorsloth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reuters' original online article about this misidentified the queen bee as Queen Elizabeth, stating that Britain's monarch was capable of laying "up to 2,000 eggs a day"
    they've corrected it, but you can see the original article here:
    http://www.regrettheerror.com/2006/10/reuters_typo _te.html

  6. Pretty cool, but by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Funny

    I understand this is pretty cool, but what could all the buzz bee about?

  7. Re:Honey bee genome sequenced? by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gee thanks, now I'm going to spend the rest of the day imagining cows flitting from flower to flower gathering pollen.

    KFG

  8. Re:What about variations? by valis · · Score: 3, Informative

    The human genome projects worked from DNA samples pooled from a number of individuals, which were then assembled into a consensus "human genome". However the original sequenced reads can be aligned back to the reference to find differences (such as SNPs -- single nucleotide polymorphisms).

    Substantial effort is underway to resequence the human genome in different individuals from different populations. The International Hapmap Project (http://www.hapmap.org/) is among the most high profile.

  9. Re:Purpose? by valis · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Am I missing something here?

    Yes. There is only so much you can do in a lab to humans. Or for that matter monkeys or mice. However PETA doesn't seem to realize that bees and flys are animals so...

    More seriously, we work with model organisms because they are much easier to work with. You can do experiments that would either cost much much more or simply be impossible in a mammal model. Depending on what you are interested in there are lots of popular model organisms: nematodes, flys, bees, zebrafish, xenopus, mouse, rat, macaque... all useful for investigating different aspects of biology, and all relevant to human health at some level.

  10. Re:What about variations? by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 3, Informative
    So when they sequence the human genome, how do they handle the variations?

    For the purposes of creating the reference sequence they essentially ignored them. In the public human genome project the DNA from a handful of individuals was used. The Celera project used mostly the DNA of one individual, Craig Venter, the head of Celera. This does make the reference sequence arbitrary, but so was the block of platinum that was used to define the kilogram. The idea is that you measure differences from the standard.

    The rule of thumb is that the sequence of any two individualss differ in about 1 base in 1000. This ignores complications like that fact that women have of two copies of the X chromosome and men have 1 X and 1 Y chromosome, and that whole sections of sequence can sometimes get shifted from one chromosome to another. As the other responder pointed out the variations are a major focus of research, particularly Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) where 90% of the population have an 'A' in a particulary position and 10% have a 'G'.
  11. Re:What about variations? by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 2, Informative

    The definition of the kilogram was originally made in terms of a particular volume of water, but was later changed to the weight of a particluar ingot of irridium-platinum.