ACLU Drops Challenge Over Patriot Act
An anonymous reader writes, "The ACLU announced on Friday that they were dropping their case against the US Government over the highly contested section 215 of the Patriot Act. ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beeson stated: 'While the reauthorized Patriot Act is far from perfect, we succeeded in stemming the damage from some of the Bush administration's most reckless policies. The ACLU will continue to monitor how the government applies the broad Section 215 power and we will challenge unconstitutional demands on a case-by-case basis.'"
Isn't it possible that the ACLU's arguments were just bunk and the lawyers decided it was better to cut and run?
Or they see some change happening in Congress in the near future and decided that might be a better way to fix the problem.
What?