Seagate To Encrypt Data On Hard Drives
Krishna Dagli writes "Seagate, using their new DriveTrust Technology, will automatically encrypt every bit of data stored on the hard drive and require users to have a key, or password, before being able to access the disk drive."
The news should be that this was announced some time a go, but is still delayed. I've been reading press releases (such as this, sadly undated example) since March of this year (yes, almost 8 months a go). No release date given in the article provided by the submitter, but I've heard rumours of Q2 2007.
This should be good when it's released, but I've long since stopped holding my breath.
Which is why smart people use something that give plausible deniability.
,etc...
truecrypt allows you to create a double encrypted volume. 2 passphrases. 1 - lets your torturers into a set of incriminating looking but innocent files, the other lets you into the real files. there is NO WAY to detect or extract the real files from the planted files.
look innocent to the coppers while you continue to hide the goodies.
looks even better if you have other things that use the same planted password and are your tax info
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Isn't commercial copyright violation a criminal offense? You can do jail time for it...
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Actually, if they monitor changes to the drive on the sector level, they would see the blocks of the hidden volume changing, which would make no sense if they exist in a section of the (outer) TrueCrypt volume that contain no files. And these changes would be visible on a journalling filesystem. So it's recommended you don't use one.
(this is all in the TrueCrypt FAQ's by the way)
You mean before being arrested, I presume. Once you've been arrested, they immediately inform you of miranda, BECAUSE they can't use anything you say before that point.
They don't gag you when you decide to remain silent. You can change your mind at any time, of course.
No. Only if they continue to interrogate you after you ask for an attorney, can it be thrown out. If the suspect asks for an attorney, then spontaneously volunteers info, it would be usable. Conversely, after the attorney arrives, anything you say can be used (which is why lawyers repeatedly advise you not to say anything).
Generally good advice. And beforehand, you should repeatedly ask if you are being placed under arrest, and if you are free to go, otherwise they can essentially (defacto) interrogate you with no miranda restrictions, as long as they like.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant