Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Banning 360 Firmware Modders?

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the well-it-wouldn't-surprise-me dept.

arcon5 writes "After several months of silence it was more or less accepted that Microsoft wasn't going to do anything about the firmware hacks that allow Xbox 360s to play backups. Rather surprising, considering the 'inventor' of the hack confirmed in March already that the mods are easily detectable, and the reports that piracy is running rampant in countries like China. It appears that Microsoft is finally taking action against them though, although they may be hitting the wrong persons." Best part of that article is the firmware chip encased in epoxy.

3 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. It's fishy by Wind_Walker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's the Original Xbox.com post about it. It seems very fishy for a few reasons:

    First, he's hiding his played games. That's a very very rare thing to do, because it's just not necessary. Who cared what games you've played, unless you've modded something?

    Second, he's got a Gamerscore of 77103. For those who don't have a 360, each game is given a budget of 1000 Gamerpoints which can be unlocked however the game publisher wants - usually it's points-per-level, or for unlocking things in the game. Xbox Live Arcade games get a budget of 200. Gamerankings.com gives me a total of 66 games released for the Xbox 360. That's 66,000 possible points if he finished anything and everything - and most of the games are nigh impossible for any mortal to get all 1000 points on.

    Lastly, he's currently playing Cars online as I type. That game is not scheduled to be shipped until tomorrow the 31st, in-stores probably November 1st. If this were the only thing odd I'd just attribute it to a broken street date, but considering all the factors it sounds like he is using a not-quite-ethical way to play games in a way Microsoft didn't intend.

  2. Re: Piracy in china... by Tweekster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately for them, they dont get the choice in the matter.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  3. Re:What a gloriously stupid assumption... by dhalgren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No.

    Historically, archival copies were allowed and expected to be allowed. No medium is impervious to aging and wear. Some media can be damaged by using them.

    Paying $5 (or 5 cents) for the right--and it is still a legal and moral* right to keep archival copies--is wrong. *IMHO, of course.

    Torben