Slashdot Mirror


Has Verizon Forfeited Common Carrier Status?

An anonymous reader writes, "Freedom of speech, the future of the Net, you name it. In October, a U.S. vigilante group asked Verizon to cut off Net access to Epifora, a Canadian ISP that hosts a number of (entirely legal) web sites offering support to minor-attracted adults. Shortly thereafter, Verizon gave 30 days notice to Epifora, ending a 5 year relationship. Telecos have traditionally refrained from censoring legal content, arguing that as 'common carriers' it is outside of their scope to make such decisions. Furthermore, they have refrained because if they did so in some cases, they might be legally liable for other cases where they did not exercise censorship. The questions are: has Verizon forfeited their claim to common-carrier status by selectively censoring legal speech that they do not like? And can the net effectively route around censorship if the trunk carriers are allowed to pick and choose whom they allow to connect?"

1 of 721 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Possibly NSFW? by fyngyrz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No, silly person. It is humor because it does that. It is humor because your average Christian doesn't know the spanish inquisition from the papal inquisition, couldn't explain why Job offered his daughters to the crowd, doesn't have a clue as to how incest figures into the bible stories, and couldn't give you an accurate summary of what they think about their faith in the first place. No more than I go about figuring out how to convert Christians into sensible human beings. I don't. I don't care what you think, as long as you don't try to make me or members of my family think it, too.

    Flamebait. Brother, if I wanted to flame Christianity, the whole place would still be on fire. Levity, not Levi.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.