Slashdot Mirror


Gaming Politics To Watch Today

As you go to the polls today, alongside more serious issue be sure to think of how politics affects the gaming world. GamePolitics has a rundown of politicians associated with gaming (in either a good or bad way) who are up for re-election today. From the article: "Hillary Clinton (D-NY): sponsor of the Family Entertainment Protection Act (FEPA). Joe Lieberman (I-CT): his criticism of game violence in the mid-1990's led directly to the formation of the ESRB. Rick Santorum (R-PA): backs Hillary's game initiatives, but also backs the ESRB. George Allen (R-VA): backs the ESRB rating system. Candidate Mike McGavick (R-WA): trying to unseat Democrat Maria Cantwell; he believes the entertainment industry will not regulate itself and wants to explore legislative solutions."

2 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. Oh Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I can think of at least 20 more important issues that would decide how I would vote today before video games comes into play. The idea that anybody would elect anybody based on that stance is asinine and immature.

  2. Re:War, economy, abortion, jobs.... gaming by theckhd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it's something to consider (first amendment and such), but let's not lose sight of the big picture here.

    For example, I don't care if Rick Santorum backs the ESRB or not, his voting record (and general asshattery) is more than enough to dissuade me from voting for him.

    I mean seriously, the man is against gay marriage and gay rights, tried to slip Intelligent Design into the No Child Left Behind act, has said that he doesn't belive in privacy rights, and is anti-abortion. If you have an opinion on any of those issues, then his stance on the ESRB is probably irrelevant when you decide whether or not to vote for him.