Slashdot Mirror


What's With All This Spam?

coondoggie writes to mention a Network World article about soaring spam levels, confirmed now by researchers, IT managers, and security vendors. So, indeed, it's not just you: October was a spammy month. From the article: "Levine's assumption is this spike in spam levels is a result of a new generation of viruses and zombies that can infect PCs more quickly and are harder to get rid of. In its October report, messaging security vendor MessageLabs says the spike is largely due to two Trojan programs, Warezov and SpamThru. Others say a new breed of spam messages called image spam -- messages with text embedded in an image file that evade spam filters, which can't recognize the words inside the image -- is responsible." A note: I have no interest in penny stocks.

8 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. Ameritrade by masterz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many of these stock spams have been going to people who have accounts at Ameritrade. It is likely that their email list has been stolen. See http://www.billkatz.com/node/77 for details.

  2. Domain owners: Set up SPF NOW!!! by GWBasic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Domain owners: Set up SPF NOW!!!

    I set up SPF on my domains and the number of bounces from spoofed SPAM dropped dramatically.

    Do not wait any longer, do your duty to the internet community: Set up SPF NOW!!!

  3. Reverse OCR by mwilliamson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At work we use spam assassin with a gpl OCR plugin, however, it's getting foiled by intentional added noise in the images. I propose we come up with a way to detect these non-character elements (noise) in the associated spam images instead of just trying to OCR the text. The noise I've seen seems to be like it should be easily detectable.

    "Begun, this Captcha Wars has."
    -Yada

  4. Don't be so smug by Kris_J · · Score: 5, Informative

    I barely get any spam either, but my ISP's mail servers are so choked with the stuff that real emails are being delayed by as much as two and a half days. So all of you who say "What spam?" need to be aware that, unless you only send messages to yourself, it's a real problem for everyone.

  5. i have no confirmed proof other than ethereal logs by Neuropol · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but i just recently had an older d-link wireless router that got infected with some thing that turned it in to a spam bot. it was using the router as the spam generation unit. sending out packets to and from the most random addresses. stuff that could no doubt be spam oriented. I captured about 100MB of logs pertaining to the whole issue. it even managed to block numerous updates to the firmaware. and would not allow itself to factory default. it's like it had a hwole other firmware implanted in it and was taken control of.

  6. Greylisting helps by FliesLikeABrick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since most of this spam is sent by zombies, they care nothing about the success rate of the delivery. They just pump out thousands/millions of spam messages, hit each e-mail address once and move on. If it fails or appears to fail then it just moves to the next since single-digit success rates still result in thousands or millions of free advertising for the spammer.

    As a result, using greylisting results in filtering a HUGE amount of spam out since it fakes a temporary failure from any new server connecting and waits for the server to try sending the mail again after a defined delay (according to the RFC, mailservers are supposed to try sending again if they get this temporary deferral).

    I set this up on my primary server (ubuntu with postfix) and saw a 99% decrease in spam since none of the zombies care enough to try connecting again. By the time a zombie gets upgraded to be wise enough to evade this, it is likely to fail all kinds of other spam tests anyway (referring mainly to blacklists, though blacklisting can be extremely evil by nature).

    If you run a mailserver, definitely look into setting this up. The wikipedia article explains the low-risk nature and exactly how it works: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting

  7. Pump and dump by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I run a small, but publicly traded company. Recently, I was contacted by a "PR firm" about "promoting the stock" of my company. Normally, I just hang up, but he mentioned a few "success stories" which seemed to correlate to some of the recent spam that had slipped through spamassassin. So I got his contact details and said since I was really busy "could he please email a summary of what we'd just talked about" (which he did).

    I then called the enforcement division of the SEC and said I had the name and contact details for a company that was responsible for sending a number of unsolicited pump/dump email spams to me. I also told them that I had email from the spammer himself confirming that they'd done the deed. It wasn't some innocent bystander, but the people that actually SENT the mail. I was sent to a voicemail box and assured that I'd be called back. It's now about 2 weeks later and nobody ever called me.

    And people wonder why there's so many of these vermin...uh, it's practically impossible to get caught!

  8. Filter by IPs by BerkeleyDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Spammers put garbage in the message body, subject, other headers, etc. in order to fool the spam filters - and unfortunately, they are often pretty successful.

    But one thing they cannot change is their IP addresses. I wrote a script to parse my mail and save the IP addresses (or more precisely, their first two numbers - e.g., 213.186) that appear in spam messages, but not in normal ones. Then, I run another script on my incoming mail - which marks the message as spam if it contains a blacklisted IP address.

    I update the list of IPs once in a while, and it works pretty decently. Right now, I have about 4,500 items in the list - each one corresponding to a range of 256^2 IP addresses - so it's about 7% of the whole address space (kinda scary). It blocks about 2/3 of spam, with almost no false positives. Most of my spam is also marked by the SpamAssassin (or whatever the mail server uses) and automatically moved into the spam folder, so I just run the script once in a while, and it "learns" on its own.