Slashdot Mirror


Preview of Vista On Old Hardware

Grooves writes "According to tests performed by Ars Technica, Windows Vista will need some coddling on old hardware. As a follow-up to their performance review of Vista Beta 2, Ars tested the latest public builds of Vista on hardware spanning from 2001 to a Thinkpad purchased a few months ago. The results show that Vista is extremely RAM hungry, graphical power is less of an issue unless you want eye candy, and hard drive I/O is critical. Also, their experience with 'in-place upgrades' was abysmal, and mirrored my own experiences."

4 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. Cunning strategy. by Headcase88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The OS keeps the hardware so busy it doesn't have time to run any viruses. (Or anything else for that matter).

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  2. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's got some truth to it, obviously, but it's not entirely true.

    I have an old celeron 333 laptop, I think it originally ran 95 or 98. I have had linux on it for years, including the latest Debian unstable. KDE was a dog on it, Gnome ran ok. Someone told me they needed a laptop, but they wanted Windows, so I tried to install Windows on it, any version.

    Win XP installer would lock up after about 20 minutes of copying files. Win 2k did the same thing. I tried Win 95/98 but there was no place to get the drivers for the hardware, I'm not even sure what brand the laptop is anymore, the label on the bottom has worn off, and in those versions of windows, nothing works right on a laptop without a million extra drivers that don't come with the OS.

    I know the hardware wasn't bad because linux worked fine on it.

    So anyway, yeah if you want to talk sluggishness of the OS/GUI, windows and linux are not too different on older hardware. Linux, however, it a lot more likely to actually get the OS installed, detect the hardware, and give you a usable system.

    I suspect MS probably puts less effort into making sure that quirks in old hardware are taken into account, as seen by the crashing installer of XP and 2K on it.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  3. Will it run on my UNIVAC? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    And does anyone have a copy on punch cards they could dupe for me? I had the early release candidate all ported over to the UNIVAC standard 90-column cards and ready to go, but during the last inventory I spilled coffee on one of the DLL batches, jumped up in surprise, and accidentally knocked over crate #47,128.

    Will someone please bring me a new rip of Vista right away, or at the very least a large rake?

  4. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along by imboboage0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even Windows ME is still run on some computers.

    Where? They must be quarantined!

    --
    Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.