Code Execution Bug In Broadcom Wi-Fi Driver
2U*U2 writes to mention an EWeek article about an entry in the Month of Kernel Bugs. John Ellch has discovered a critical vulnerability in the Broadcom wireless driver: a driver used in machines from HP, Dell, Gateway, and eMachines. From the article: "[The bug] is a stack-based buffer overflow in the Broadcom BCMWL5.SYS wireless device driver that could be exploited by attackers to take complete control of a Wi-Fi-enabled laptop. The vulnerability is caused by improper handling of 802.11 probe responses containing a long SSID field and can lead to arbitrary kernel-mode code execution. The volunteer ZERT (Zero Day Emergency Response Team) warns that the flaw could be exploited wirelessly if a vulnerable machine is within range of the attacker."
Thanks for mentioning the affected operating system(s). Oh wait, you didn't...
Here, I'll help:
Code Execution Bug in Broadcom Wi-Fi Windows Driver
Checklist for today:
"Hegelians, who love a synthesis, will probably conclude that he wears a wig." - Bertrand Russell
SANS has a concise summary:
0 1b45094b0425b829255e39eb2f8d2
6 .html
http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1845&isc=2e
Or look at the Month of Kernel Bugs site itself:
http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/MOKB-11-11-200
George Ou at ZDNet has published a procedure on how to use the Linksys drivers with devices from other vendors such as Dell and HP. Of course this is not an ideal solution but if it works it's better than nothing.
-------
Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
C is the source of all these problems. Please stop using it.
It's not that simple. C is used in high performance code specifically because it's fast and compact. You get these improvements by avoiding needless length checking. Obviously there are cases where you _do_ need to length check buffers (and exploits are the result of not doing this), but you don't have to length check everything. If you ditch C in favour of a language that does the length checking for you then you will sacrifice speed and compactness since it will be checking _everything_.
What language would you suggest is more suitable for writing high performance kernel code?
http://blog.nexusuk.org