Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Gracenote Defends Its Evolution

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the well-straighter-anyway dept.

In the beginning was a music recognition database called CDDB, and it was good. Now, people accuse Gracenote of stealing its success. CDDB and Gracenote architect Steve Scherf sets the record straight.

1 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why did people submit data to cddb? by Quaryon · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know how it works now, but if I recall correctly the big change that happened when CDDB became Gracenote was that they started insisting on a fee to be paid by application developers wishing to write code that would connect to their database. You would need some kind of unique developer key to connect, which cost money. This immediately meant that all the open source software that was previously able to use CDDB was suddenly without an information source for some of their functionality. It took some time for freedb to be set up with servers that could handle the required load, and for all the end-user application software to be able to redirect to those servers. This is the fundamental reason why a lot of people got very upset with Gracenote, because there was a time when all the information freely submitted to CDDB was unusable, as none of the pieces of OSS that people were using were able to access the data.

    So, you may not pay money yourself, but that doesn't mean that money is not changing hands in order for you to be able to use that feature.

    Q.