Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia Explodes In China

eldavojohn writes "The Chinese have recently been allowed to enjoy the Chinese version of Wikipedia now that the ban has been lifted. And the result is an explosion in use after being banned for a year. From the article, 'Activity on nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's Chinese Wikipedia site has skyrocketed since its release, which Internet users in China first started reporting on Nov. 10. Since then, the number of new users registering to contribute to the site has exceeded 1,200 a day, up from an average of 300 to 400 prior to the unblocking. The number of new articles posted daily has increased 75% from the week before, with the total now surpassing 100,000, according to the foundation.' No one's sure how long this will be available to the People's Republic of China but hopefully the government will recognize that at least a significant part of the populace enjoys a Wikipedia community."

3 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Tienanmen Square by Darvin · · Score: 3, Informative
    Very interesting to see the Tienanmen Square wiki in Chinese. Already it has been locked down due to 'vandalism'

    Heh.

    See it zh.wikipedia.org/

  2. Actual statistics and charts by fuzheado · · Score: 3, Informative
    Strangely, the WSJ article does not mention any links or references to where to find the raw data.

    It was based on charts and research I did from Beijing.

    Cheers.

  3. Re:Censorship is a bad thing by Sinbios · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, the page is locked due to vandalizing and a dispute notice is put up, just like any other controversial article. And just like other articles, the article itself is pretty objective. As for the death toll specifically, the article says that the number of deaths is disputed; it cites one of the protesters Chai Ling as saying in a recording: "Some say there are about 200 dead, but some claim there are more than 4000. I am not sure of the exact numbers, either." Again, just like any "free" wiki article - explains the controversy and cites an objective source instead of making groundless assertions.

    So yeah, I really wish people would stop making snide remarks as if the Chinese wiki is the government's parade ground, without even taking a look at it. Controversial topics aren't really censored, and it operates pretty much like the rest of Wikipedia when it comes to these topics. You have to remember that in the end, it's still managed by Wikipedia moderators, who ideally will try their utmost to ensure that articles are accurate and objective.

    --
    Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry