NASA Weighs Moon Plans
mknewman writes "Space.com is reporting that NASA is set to roll out next month a U.S. national strategy for lunar exploration, one that outlines both robotic exploration needs and the rationale for sending humans back to the Moon. This has been sorely missing in Bush's Vision for Space Exploration."
So busty chicks will have more "perkiness", but retain the same nice tactile qualities...
Posted AC, of course!
The real action is going to be on Phobos and Mars, in that order. Don't look for the next Iceland, look for the next New York City, the slam-dunk locations in space. The Lagrange points in the Earth-Moon system, Earth-crossing "dead" comets and Mar's small moons are good candidates. Phobos allows both resource extraction including actual water (not maybes in polar shadows), Phobos also offers realtime contact with Mars and the convenience of working in familiar freefall. The moon has a lot of unaddressed operational issues that a Phobos/Mars orbitter and mine scheme doesn't possess. Admittedly there is a lot of handwaving in this, but we discussed the tradeoffs here:
r d=businesstech&Number=503952&page=&view=&sb=&o=
http://uplink.space.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Boa
Josh
gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
That may have happened in some alternate universe - but in this one, the plans are in a variety of archives.