ICANN Under Pressure Over Non-Latin Characters

RidcullyTheBrown writes "A story from the Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that ICANN is under pressure to introduce non-Latin characters into DNS names sooner rather than later. The effort is being spearheaded by nations in the Middle East and Asia. Currently there are only 37 characters usable in DNS entries, out of an estimated 50,000 that would be usable if ICANN changed naming restrictions. Given that some bind implementations still barf on an underscore, is this really premature?" From the article: "Plans to fast-track the introduction of non-English characters in website domain names could 'break the whole internet', warns ICANN chief executive Paul Twomey ... Twomey refuses to rush the process, and is currently conducting 'laboratory testing' to ensure that nothing can go wrong. 'The internet is like a fifteen story building, and with international domain names what we're trying to do is change the bricks in the basement,' he said. 'If we change the bricks there's all these layers of code above the DNS ... we have to make sure that if we change the system, the rest is all going to work.'" Given that some societies have used non-Latin characters for thousands of years, is this a bit late in coming?

Comments

Re:Make 'em all speak english

[igb]

Amusingly, when the issue is non-UTF8 character sets, or censorship, or anything else that upsets the non-Western countries, they start shouting threats like ``Turkey will start its own top-level domains'' or ``Iran will disconnect from the Internet''. Which I'm sure is terribly impressive in UN-type meetings where we're supposed to pretend that all countries' opinions matter, but in the real world is an entirely hollow threat.

Were some random non-UTF8 country to make interworking with the rest of the Internet harder, it would be cutting its nose off to spite its face. For the G7 countries (yes, G7, not G8), the value of Internet connectivity to random minor countries is minimal. The value to those countries of Internet connectivity is large. Do US users care if Uzbekistan is on the Internet? No: it has zero impact on 99% of them, minimal impact on 0.9% of them, etc. Do people in Uzbekistan care about being able to access Google, Wikipedia, Amazon, CNN, the BBC? I rather think they do.

No one likes pointing out to random minor countries that their presence on the Internet is far more in their interest than it is in anyone else's. But that doesn't make it any the less true. So, in general terms, the choice they're getting is ``largely anglophone, largely UTF-8, or nothing''.

ian