Slashdot Mirror


Emissions of Key Greenhouse Gas Stabilize

brian0918 writes "Multiple news sites are reporting that levels of the second most important greenhouse gas, methane, have stabilized". From Scientific American: "During the two decades of measurements, methane underwent double-digit growth as a constituent of our atmosphere, rising from 1,520 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) in 1978 to 1,767 ppbv in 1998. But the most recent measurements have revealed that methane levels are barely rising anymore — and it is unclear why." From NewScientist: "Although this is good news, it does not mean that methane levels will not rise again, and that carbon dioxide remains the 800-pound gorilla of climate change."

10 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Water Vapor? by Erioll · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about Water Vapor (or vapour, depending on where you live)? I've heard that's a major contributor... though the talk you hear about it is... a heated discussion at the very least (flamefests usually).

    1. Re:Water Vapor? by PineHall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, water vapor contributes the most to the Greenhouse Effect. I have always wondered how much we affect the climate through irrigated fields and a host of other means of adding water vapor to the atmosphere. The debate happens when you consider clouds and latent heating (water vapor becoming liquid). Then it becomes less clear on what the net effect of water in all its forms has on the climate. This is an active area of study and there is still a lot to learn.

  2. Re:Arctic by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, approximately half of the floating arctic icecap melts every year, due to temperature fluctuations and ice currents. Approximately every seven years, the entire floating arctic icecap is renewed. Note that this doesn't include glacial ice in Greenland, Alaska, Scandinavia, etc.

  3. Scares the bejesus out of me by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So here we are, currently doing basically bugger all about global warming, but with plenty of computer simulations and estimates about how much warming will happen in how many years, and plenty of politics going on about who should pay for it, and what about second world countries, and AFAICS it's basically a game of how long can be put off doing something about this, because it's going to cost plenty of money and we don't seem to need to be doing it just right now...

    Now, out of the blue, something *utterly* unexpected, inexplicable and major happens - the rate of methane emission levels out; and no one has a *CLUE* why.

    Well, I can hear this ticking noise...

    I sure hope we figure out interplanetry colonization soon.

    You know - just in case.

  4. Re:Wait a minute... by cloricus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Awesome so we can all just ignore this then? Cause like God would never let some thing as bad as Global Warming happen in the first place!? ...Oh wait...

    Sarcasm aside I do worry what would happen if some one put it into the minds of the fundy Christians that Global Warming was the precursor to revelations and the like. With their collective political power in the first world I think we'd have a huge problem on our hands just like we do with their infection of the common understanding of science among the dumb masses. Before any one flames I'm saying this as a worried (liberal) Roman Catholic - I trust the fundies in my religion as much as the next atheist...

    --
    I ate your fish.
  5. Re:Arctic by Capsaicin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    His point is that we can't just burn the methane, because that would produce water vapor and carbon dioxide, which hardly makes the problem better...

    I'm sorry? Methane has a forcing potential of up to 24 times as much of CO2.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  6. Re:I wonder if this has to do with BSE by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wetlands 76%
    Termites 11%
    Oceans 8%
    Hydrates 5%


    http://www.epa.gov/methane/sources.html#natural

    So my first guess would be a global reduction of wetlands. Nope, I shall not look for evidence now, it is 3a.m. .

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  7. Re:Arctic by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Get your stories straight or don't post..misinformation doesn't benefit anyone"

    Not sure what your point is here since the GP didn't mention Anatartica, Arctic ice comes from the Arctic (north), Antartic ice comes from Antartica (south). Since the mid 1950's the Arctic ice cap has lost ~60% of it's volume (although one "skeptic" belives the missing ice is hiding behind Canada somewhere).

    There has been very little change in the volume of the Antartic ice cap, however both the Antartic penninsula and Greenland have experinced a +3C rise in average tempratures compared to the +1C global average (accurately predicted by climate models I might add).

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  8. Re:I wonder if this has to do with BSE by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.carbonpositive.net/viewarticle.aspx?art icleID=442

    "Scientists have discovered why atmospheric levels of methane have stabilised in recent years, but their findings are bad news for industry and agriculture where rising emissions of the greenhouse gas have been revealed.
    The scientists, including researchers from France's Climate and Environment Science Laboratory and Australia's national science agency CSIRO, found that a reduction in natural emissions of methane from wetlands has been masking rising emissions from human-related activity."

    Sic! Intuition still works, and, believe me, I did not read this before.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  9. Natural gas prices and methane leaks by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it may be related to the rise in natural gas prices, and the natural urge for gas producers to go plug up leaks at those prices.

    Natural gas production is the leading source of Russian methane emissions, for instance. And in 1990, Russia leaked as much as 26 million tons of methane. It was probably worth their while to plug some of these leaks at current prices.