Slashdot Mirror


Do You Own Your Native Language?

l2718 writes "In a new take on the reach of 'Intellectual Property,' the Mapuche Indians of Chile are accusing Microsoft of linguistic piracy. Their lawsuit alleges that Microsoft needed permission from the tribal elders before translating its software into Mapuzugun, a project which was co-ordinated with the Chilean Ministry of Education." From the CNN Money article: "The Mapuche took their case to a court in the southern city of Temuco earlier this month but a judge ruled it should be considered in Santiago. A judge in the capital is due to decide in the next two weeks whether Microsoft has a case to answer. 'If they rule against us we will go to the Supreme Court and if they rule against us there we will take our case to a court of human rights,' said Lautaro Loncon, a Mapuche activist and coordinator of the Indigenous Network, an umbrella group for several ethnic groups in Chile."

25 of 472 comments (clear)

  1. Time to call my patent lawyer by Codename46 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be right back, about to file a language patent for "English"

    1. Re:Time to call my patent lawyer by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thou shalt be cast down for prior art.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:Time to call my patent lawyer by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Funny
      "...Whereas in America, they haven't spoken it for years."

      -- Henry Higgens

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:Time to call my patent lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That hasn't stopped Microsoft.

    4. Re:Time to call my patent lawyer by Tiiba · · Score: 2, Funny

      Including you.

    5. Re:Time to call my patent lawyer by johnw · · Score: 2, Funny
      Good idea, then I'll get the "Engrish" patent

      That's a film with Kristin Scott-Thomas isn't it?
    6. Re:Time to call my patent lawyer by TheBogBrushZone · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can have everything except the letter 'i'. Apparently Apple own that one.

      --
      And behold, a command prompt and he who sat upon it, his name was shutdown and -h 3:11 followed with him
  2. JHjhKH kh KH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kllskjlf KJkJLFKJG L S jksldjl!! ; lkj flkjLk!: JF; kj

  3. Can Jim Henson.... by Cheapy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can Jim Henson sue Google over their option to translate to Swedish Chef?

    Bork bork bork!

    --
    Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    1. Re:Can Jim Henson.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can Jim Henson sue Google over their option to translate to Swedish Chef?

      No, because he's dead, Jim.

  4. OH! YOU ARE SO SUED! by Petersko · · Score: 5, Funny

    The actual name of the language is Mapudungun.

    Clearly they got it wrong to avoid being dragged into court. You, on the other hand, have opened yourself to a lawsuit!

  5. Obligatory /. Jokes by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, WELCOME our new NgeMimbwa Overlords.

    In Soviet Russia, the Language Manag'hwhabwa's YOU!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  6. To whomever owns the copyright to this language by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    called "human female", please, please, PLEASE release it into the public domain so the rest of us can maybe hope to understand it!

  7. Re:l33t pwned? by GoombaTroopa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, it looks like someone could claim ownership of l33t talk.

    [Readies the knuckles]
    And will therefore be responsible...

  8. I know this language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new PERL overlords.

  9. Re:Profit from language? by LindseyJ · · Score: 4, Funny
    (Ignore the fact that this is how babies learn to speak.)

    I am right, if you ignore all the inconvenient facts that make me wrong.
  10. Re:Profit from language? by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    But nations are much more than just groups of people. They're groups of people with semi-arbitrary geopolitical borders.

  11. translations .... by argoff · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, well...

    "lets just be friends" translates to "jump off a cliff and commit suicide"
    "I seek a man who is kind with a big heart" translates to "I seek a man who is rich with a big wallet"
    "can we talk" translates to "you're in deep shit and you're gonna get it"
    "this is cute" translates to "give me the dough, now!"
    "we feel..." translates to "I'm gonna make you feel..."
    "marrage" translates to "on a tight leash" ... hope that helps.

  12. Re:L'apostrophe strikes again! by asCii88 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yu netives spek einglish bad. We estudients of einglish speik einglish best.

  13. Embrace and extend? by ml10422 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't Microsoft just rename the language option "Mooboo", then add a bunch of new words and grammatical constructs to the language? That's what they do with everything else.

  14. Re:Profit from language? by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2, Funny

    You do not make a strong case for language ownership.

    --
    I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  15. Brings new meaning... by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brings new meaning to free as in speech.

  16. Re:Profit from language? by bitt3n · · Score: 3, Funny
    Languages are not created. They evolve. Nobody can own one.
    well, there's Esperanto. I suppose suing Microsoft for using Esperanto might help the guy who speaks it find another hobby than talking to himself.
  17. In related news by Budenny · · Score: 2, Funny

    The UK Language Ministry admitted in response to questioning that it was investigating the possibility that pirated copies of English may have been exported to the US, Canada and New Zealand in previous centuries. 'All we are interested in doing' said a spokesperson 'is making sure our citizens get the proper returns on their intellectual property' She went on to explain that the UK had devoted millions of man years of development into raising English to its present expressive levels from its Germanic, Anglo Saxon and Norman roots.

    She agreed that what was probably needed was a test case to clarify the matter. 'We would pick some arbitrary person, like a mother in Kalamazoo, who has been observed and recorded teaching her child an illegally copied version of our language. Then we will sue the hell out of her. Win or lose, that will encourage others to pay proper royalties to the UK, and ensure that further development of our language can be properly funded'.

  18. Re:Profit from language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Slashdot users are already complaining about the US's excessively long copyright terms. Now you want to grant protection to language which are thousands of years old?