Mars Hi-Res & Thermal Images Payoff
eldavojohn writes "The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter & Mars Odyssey Orbiter took high resolution images (and shots of each other) earlier this year and after studying them, experts believe that there are too many boulders around the proposed Phoenix Mars Lander landing site. From the article, 'At the end of January 2007, scientists will meet to see if there is an obvious choice for a landing site. If not, they will keep analyzing the data until summer 2007. They are comparing HiRISE's data with that taken by the Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) camera on the Mars Odyssey orbiter. Since boulders hold heat better than soil or sand, they show up in THEMIS images taken early in the morning.'"
I would prefer that they exercise careful scrutiny and second-guessing of their decision here. Considering how long it actually takes us to build, launch, and deploy these bots, I'd rather them take their time and get it right, rather than dropping it on the surface and then WTFing when they encounter an "unforseen problem".
:)
It's the Blizzard approach to NASA that is preferable
Wouldn't it make more sense to take thermal image shots a little while after sundown instead? Doing in the morning strikes me as being less accurate, as depressions in the ground/shadowed spots will heat less quickly than other areas. At night, once the sun has gone down, soil should more or less cool at about the same rate. It seems like they'd get less false positives at night. Maybe I'm just crazy.
Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
If it gets cold it can just use its phasers to heat a nearby boulder for warmth.
If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
"experts believe that there are too many boulders around the proposed Phoenix Mars Lander landing site."
Uh huh. It just happens to be by RANDOM CHANCE that there are too many boulders around the proposed landing site. Sure. I think that the chances of there being too many boulders is astronomically unlikely. Boulders require a "boulderer", as it were. This must be the result of Intelligent Geology. How else can you explain it?
billions of dollars and we now know: if we send something to land on mars, it may or may not land on rocks.
It seems the weekly quota of links to New Scientist has not been filled yet.
Get clicking people, make sure the New Scientist logs show lots of referrals from Slashdot!
First of all, it's the only way to be sure! Secondly, it should produce a nice glass "mirror" to land on. Problem solved.
Belief is the currency of delusion.
Offtopic I know, but here's a flipside question that occurred to me when RTFA: if we were an alien species sending probes to land on Earth, where would we pick to land based on imagery of at the resolution we're getting back from Mars?
And don't say here
When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
Since boulders hold heat better than soil or sand, they show up...
Err.. has someone discovered soil on Mars? Damnit, I miss all the real news.
there are too many boulders around the proposed Phoenix Mars Lander landing site.
Boulder? On Mars? That must be why its called Boulder Colorodo (Color Red-o).
*groan*
Have you read my journal today?
heheheh, you made me snort cornflakes :D
When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.