Trusted Or Treacherous Computing?
theodp writes "Just because Richard Stallman is paranoid doesn't mean Microsoft's not out to get you. For a hint about the possible end-game of Microsoft's Trusted Computing Initiative, check out the patent application published Thanksgiving Day for Trusted License Removal, in which Microsoft describes how to revoke rights to render based on 'who the user is, where the user is located, what type of computing device or other playback device the user is using, what rendering application is calling the copy protection system, the date, the time, etc.' So much for Microsoft's you-should-have-control assurances."
Oh man, you were doing great right up until this part.
You really need to study American history again if you don't get this @#$% by now. Our founding fathers understood this stuff, and that's why "checks and balances" are a part of our government
Then you finish up with this:
(2000-2006 excepted).
You seriously think that getting around checks and balances is a new occurrence in the last six years? Let me say that you need to go back and study your American history.
Let me refresh your memory on a few things:
There are dozens of other examples in just the last fifty years, including the secret overflights of Soviet territory by US reconnaissance aircraft, CIA testing of drugs (LSD, IIRC) on members of the populations of several metropolitan areas.