Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Soul of A New Microsoft

Posted by Zonk on from the nice-picture-j dept.

BusinessWeek Online is running a front page story today about the new future of Microsoft. By 'looking beyond Windows', the company is utilizing fresh blood to come up with new products like the Zune, the Xbox 360, and various online sites. While the Zune probably isn't getting off to as successful a start as they might have liked, the article argues it's a positive sign that they're at least making the attempt. From the article: "The point is that Microsoft needs to find its un-Vista. Several of them, in fact. The software giant is entering perhaps the greatest upheaval in its 30-year history. New business models are emerging--from low-cost "open-source" software to advertising-supported Web services--that threaten Microsoft's core business like never before. For investors to care about the company, it needs to find new growth markets. Its $44.3 billion in annual sales are puttering along at an 11% growth pace. Its shares, which soared 9,560% throughout the 1990s, sunk 63% in 2000 when the Internet bubble burst, and they have yet to fully recover."

7 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Percent confusion by Nemetroid · · Score: 2, Informative
    Its shares, which soared 9,560% throughout the 1990s, sunk 63% in 2000 when the Internet bubble burst, and they have yet to fully recover."
    If there is someone out there that thinks this was a minor loss because of the strange wording, it wasn't.
  2. The Name is "Gary Kildall". by reporter · · Score: 5, Informative
    The name that you are seeking is "Gary Kildall". His work revolutionized the operating system (OS) on personal computers (PC), and many of his ideas survive into the modern PC OS.

    To summarize a very long story, an employee at Seattle Computer Products (SCP) cloned (i.e., ripped off) CP/M, which Kildall developed. Bill Gates, the young founder of Microsoft, licensed an OS to IBM, but this OS was not yet under the control of Gates. In other words, Gates sold a product that he did not actually have. After inking the deal with IBM, Gates then bought a permanent liftime license to SCP's OS. That OS morphed over a two decades into the infamous line of Windows OSes.

    As for Kildall, he understandably became very bitter. Kildall was financially well off, but he never achieved either the fame or the wealth that Gates achieved. If Gates had gotten the billion-dollar wealth but Kildall had gotten the fame (for his work on OSes), then Kildall would probably have accepted the outcome. However, Kildall achieved neither the fame nor the wealth. The bitterness drove Kildall to essentially commit suicide by drinking himself to death. He died in a bar.

    I understand Kildall's feelings. Someone had screwed me in the same way that Gates screwed Kildall.

    1. Re:The Name is "Gary Kildall". by bogjobber · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why the hell does QDOS get such a bad rap for ripping off CP/M? As far as I understand it, all they did was clone the API. It had near-identical functionality as CP/M, but nobody working on QDOS had any knowledge of the actual CP/M code. When DRI stalled in discussions with IBM, Microsoft jumped on the opportunity to take their place. If Kildall really desired the fame and wealth, then he shouldn't have screwed up the business deal with IBM. What is wrong with that? Is there something I'm missing? I never hear people complaining about companies cloning IBM PC's. Am I just wildly misinformed?

    2. Re:The Name is "Gary Kildall". by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
      the as-yet unreleased CP/M-86 was {IBM's] first choice for an operating system because CP/M had the most applications at the time. Negotiations between Digital Research and IBM quickly deteriorated over IBM's non-disclosure agreement and its insistence on a one-time fee rather than DRI's usual royalty licensing plan. After discussions with Microsoft, IBM licensed an operating system similar to CP/M that a Seattle area computer company had made for its own hardware. This system became PC-DOS. CP/M-86

      Gates gambled that he could deliver a serviceable OS in time for the scheduled release of the IBM PC. He kept the asking price low. He negotiated a non-exclusive license that helped open to door to the PC-clone.

      In entrepreneur capitalism this is what separates the men from the boys. You cut a deal and you make it work.

      Kidall mistakenly thought he had more time and a stronger position from which to bargain.

      CP/M-86 arrived too late and cost much more than people were willing to pay.

    3. Re:The Name is "Gary Kildall". by Bamafan77 · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Kildall was financially well off, but he never achieved either the fame or the wealth that Gates achieved. If Gates had gotten the billion-dollar wealth but Kildall had gotten the fame (for his work on OSes), then Kildall would probably have accepted the outcome. However, Kildall achieved neither the fame nor the wealth. The bitterness drove Kildall to essentially commit suicide by drinking himself to death. He died in a bar."
      Anyone one who kills himself for not being rich or famous enough (especially if he's already rich and very famous in certain circles as was Kildall) probably is a miserable person anyway and in need of psychiatric help.

      Additionally,from your linked Wikipedia entry:

      When the IBM PC was introduced, IBM sold the operating system as an unbundled (but necessary) option. One of the operating system options was PC-DOS, priced at US$60. A new port of CP/M, called CP/M-86, was offered a few months later and priced at $240. Largely due to its early availability and the substantial price difference, PC-DOS became the preferred operating system.
      You say Gates "ripped off" Kildall. It sounds to me that Gates sold a compelling alternative that was 4 times cheaper and did the job well enough that users didn't care. Kildall was a rich guy who got beat in business by someone who was smarter in this specific instance. Hardly worth killing yourself over. It's time we stopped feeling so sorry for this guy (outside of his obvious need for psychiatric help).
  3. Re:need to find their heart by oc255 · · Score: 2, Informative

    how many company's do you know of whose business model included a goal or contingency to be bought out by Microsoft?

    A couple. First, promised Unix integration in a domain. A product that would serve up /etc/passwd accounts to 2000 domains was brought to its knees by promised vaporware and then MS bought them out. Why would I buy a "Unix connector" when 2000 is promising to have it? Killed their revenue stream, was easy to make an offer. Classic vaporware, second-hand story.

    Next, not so harsh, MS approached our company saying they would develop their own cost auditing software for telcos. It didn't happen and I wonder if they were just willing to see how much we'd play ball. I don't have as much details on this one. But this was first-hand.
  4. Re:You forgot ... by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

    They paid that to get Apple to drop the lawsuits they had going for Microsoft stealing the source code for QuickTime and putting it into Video for Windows, plus a license on all of Apple's patents.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score