Slashdot Mirror


Self-Recycling Paper

fermion writes "Xerox is reported to be working on some interesting forms of digital paper. The New York Times reports a 16 hour reusable paper. This system uses a coated paper and special ink to produce a copy that will fade over 16 hours, or sooner if the paper is put back in the copy tray. It can then be reused for a new copy, up to 10 times. According to the article, the rational for this is that paper is no longer used to store information, but merely to temporarily display it. The research suggest that in the typical office many copies end up in the recycle bin by the end of the day. The main obstacle to commercialization seems to be the question of whether people need this product. Will people have digital displays that will take the place of paper? Will something radically different from plain paper, but with competitive costs and characteristics, become popular? Xerox itself is working on something called gyricon, a system of tiny bichromal beads encased between sheets of plastics. Evidently the beads can be set electrically to either reflect of absorb light, thus allowing images to be generated at will. According to the page, the images can be set by a printer or a hand held wand. The 'paper' could even be combined with electronics to create a flexible display. So, /., where is our display technology headed? Coated conventional paper? Plastic reprintable paper? Glasses with heads up displays and wireless data feed?"

10 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Your mission, if you choose to accept it... by Centurix · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This message will recycle in 5 seconds."

    --
    Task Mangler
  2. Reusable paper good idea but only in volume by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reusable paper, I could see being used a lot by businesses - but the problem is one of coexistance with other paper. If you have reusable paper, do you have no real paper? That seems impractical. Or, do you seperate the two and perhaps have reusable paper get mixed up with real paper and tossed? What happens if you forget what you have and take notes that end up on someone else's copy later?

    There are indeed many items throughout the day that people need to temporarily display in a dense format, to which paper is ideally suited. But i think electronic paper fed data from the table it sits on or by some other means is probably better suited to this task, since it's truly reusable and probably not something you'd confuse with real paper.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  3. redundant by slidersv · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was posted @ /. almost two month ago.
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/ 07/2243222

    Come on... just search for "xerox"...

    --
    there is no issue with my network
    1. Re:redundant by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course it was, but it faded.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  4. Re:Why? by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I print stuff, read it, shred it. Why? Cause I like reading paper. The world does not revolve around you and your personal likes and, unfortunately, it doesn't revolve around mine either.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Hurdles to overcome by shirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is an interesting concept but I see it having a major shortcoming:

    You are now forced to make a decision before you print on whether the output should be temporary or permanent. Sometimes I will print something thinking it's temporary but I decide I need it longer. Or imagine the potential disaster of writing notes on the printout "in context" and that context disappears after 16 hours. Stuff like "ask Mary about this part" or "copy editing" marks.

    I applaud the idea of paper recycling like this but couldn't see myself using it.

    I think it has a few other issues too:

    1. Needing two printers to print

    2. Possibly not being able to distinguish between the two types of paper (assuming they look similar)

    3. Having to print twice if you decide that you want a permanent copy

    4. Cost(?)

    --
    Sunny

    Be my Friend

  6. Should consult the Russian space agency by iamacat · · Score: 4, Funny

    They will give some tips on using pencil and eraser as a low cost alternative

  7. Re:Neat idea. by revolu7ion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you ever spoken to a photocopier technician?
    I used to work in a library - and had to deal with the photocopier and lazer printer issues. You can't stick any old pieces of paper in those puppies - it destroys the printer, makes it jam etc. The reams have to be preferrably kept inside their box till used. Don't open half a packet and leave it there -moisture gets in and makes the paper jam more, drum life decreases - print quality decreases etc...
    I'm pictring some secretary jamming creased, folded, curled and otherwise munted pieces of 'recycling paper' into the tray of the work copier... Jim from xerox would probably faint

    --
    Jesus Saves
  8. Re:Why? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You make photocopies of money, spend photocopied money at Wal-Mart to buy a Playstation 3, sell Playstion 3 on Ebay (profit!), and Wal-Mart sues the Federal Government for disappearing money.

  9. Teacher by killa62 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This goddamn piece of paper self-recycled.
    I did my homework.
    I swear!