Slashdot Mirror


Polonium-210 Available Through Mail Order

Knutsi writes "InformationWeek is reporting that Polonium 210, the radioactive material used to poison former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko is not as hard to get your hands on as some have previously stated. American family business United Nuclear is actually selling the stuff, and other equally exotic materials, on their company website. Could come in handy for the xmas shopping season."

35 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. New level of cheating. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny



    I wonder how XBOX LIVE will dectect this?

    UberL337: hey thanx 4 sendin over teh drinks!
    TehD00d: NP mang.
    [...]
    UberL337: ug feel sick oh fukkk call ambulsafeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    TehD00d: Polonipnwed!!!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  2. A Lump of Polonium 210... by Otter+Escaping+North · · Score: 5, Funny

    When a lump of coal just won't do...

    --
    Running Windows^H^H^H^H^H^H^H OSX and Linux in the home. (I don't have time for Solitaire any more.)
    1. Re:A Lump of Polonium 210... by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What makes you think it's a KGB operation?

      For simple minds, it's KGB because an exotic poison like radioactive polonium seems kind of a signature it's no ordinary killing.

      For smarty people, it couldn't be a KGB operation because KGB is not so stupid to poison people with exotic stuff when they have ways to make appear it an ordinary killing.

      For chess playing soviet russia folks it could be a KGB operation because KGB could use the polonium as a too obvious link to make people think they're being framed while they're behind it all.

      But, the odds are 50%. So I'd not point the finger at Putin so fast.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:A Lump of Polonium 210... by ptr2004 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is already clarification on how they sell Polonium 20

      http://www.unitednuclear.com/isotopes.htm

    3. Re:A Lump of Polonium 210... by marcello_dl · · Score: 5, Funny
      bet you weren't saying that when mossad squirted poison in that arab guy's ear.

      Mossad uses Zunes on arabs? And Poison, of all distasteful bands... They seem always to reach new lows.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    4. Re:A Lump of Polonium 210... by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny
      There sure is.

      You would need about 15,000 of our Polonium-210 needle sources
      at a total cost of about $1 million - to have a toxic amount.

      Thanks!

      Nuclear Isotope - Alpha Isotope Type: Polonium-210 Qty. 15,000

      Subtotal: $1,035,000.00 USD
      Shipping & Handling: $19.95 USD
      • Bill Me Later!
  3. Not anymore by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Funny

    I stopped in a few weeks back to buy some and some Russian dude in line ahead of me bought the last of it.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  4. Feh by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The Polonium available on United Nuclear's site can be purchased without a license because the level of radioactivity, 0.1 microcurie, doesn't pose a danger, a spokesman for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission says.


    Thanks slashdot, but if I wanted baseless scare mongering about the threat of nuclear material falling into the wrong hands, I'd join the Republican Party.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Feh by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, at Republican Party meetings, all they do is smoke big cigars and laugh over how easy it is to dupe the proles. Afterwards, they go out and throw rocks at hobos.

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    2. Re:Feh by Don853 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn! I never knew what I was missing. Where do I sign up?

    3. Re:Feh by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No doubt. The United Nuclear company is great, and this isn't the first time that fearmongering affects their very small and valuable business. That, and clueless frat boys who order the largest magnets they can find, just because it's fun to buy objects which have warnings with phrases like "serious injury will occur if you just carry this magnet through a room without planning your route carefully." Science is already being dumbed down by the nanny state; it's the reason that Mr. Wizard didn't endorse a modern update to his old chemistry sets. Timmy doesn't want to see what happens when boring baking soda mixes with boring tap water, but the school gets in trouble for anything more exotic and meaningful.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  5. xmas gift by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think Bolonium is a much more appropriate holiday gift. After all, its atomic weight is deliciously snacktacular.

    1. Re:xmas gift by tkw954 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think Bolonium is a much more appropriate holiday gift. After all, its atomic weight is deliciously snacktacular.

      You said "snacktac-u-lar", it's "snackta-cle-ar", dummy.

  6. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 5, Funny
    Who cares about Uranium, when we can have supermagnets!

    Read the page, see the bait:
    Two of these magnets close together can create an almost unbelievable magnetic field that can be very dangerous. Of all the unique items we offer for sale, we consider these items the most dangerous of all. Our normal packing & shipping personnel refuse to package these magnets - our engineers have to do it. This is no joke and we cannot stress it strongly enough - that you must be extremely careful - and know what you're doing with these magnets.

    They even say "beware" elswhere. It must be good.

    Can you even resist?

    Luckily therse things cost money, or noone would care about the Flying Spaghetti Monster anymore. The Flying Magnetatorus would rule supreme.
    1. Re:Moo by 3770 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did buy magnets from there. They are freakin' awesome.

      I accidentally held them too close to each other with nothing in between and they slammed together with such a force that they made sparks and got chipped. I couldn't for the life of me get the magnets apart again until I realized that I could set one on the edge of a table and put my weight on the other to slide them apart but it still hurt my hands to do that.

      The strength will amaze you and I only bought the 1" cube magnets. I can't even begin to imagine the strength of the really big ones.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    2. Re:Moo by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Informative

      Among the most dangerous things you can give your small child are magnets - particularly the small pea-sized sort that are used in toys that are moved around on a platform by other magnets placed underneath.

      If a child swallows more than one of these magnets, they can find each other through bowel tissue and clamp together, eventually killing the tissue that ends up between them due to lack of blood flow and possibly perforating the bowel.

      The magnets they are talking about can break bones if you don't handle them correctly, and if you've ever handled smaller magnets before (who hasn't), you know that it can be tricky trying to arrange more than one magnet (even small ones) without allowing them to collide. You could probably also kill yourself with these magnets in freak circumstances.

  7. One question, comrade by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will work on moose and squirrel, yes?

    --
    IAALS.
  8. Polonium and Smoking by Venner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I found it a bit amusing when they stated that Polonium was hard to obtain. It is actually drawn from the soil into Tobacco plants and is one of the Really Bad Things implicated in smoking and cancer (along with
    the also-radioactive Lead-210, which emits gamma rays and decays into Polonium eventually.)

    Polonium-210 is an alpha emitter - something you really don't want to ingest.
    I'd have to look up dose-equivalents, etc, but if I remember correctly, it was estimated a two-pack-a-day smoker gets the radioactive equivalent of something like 300 chest X-rays a year. And remember that these are heavy metals that stay in the body for a long time!

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    1. Re:Polonium and Smoking by selex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh come on, why don't you people stomp my only joy in life some more. It causes cancer, it smells, it yellows your teeth, it stunts your growth, it makes you sterile, it slaughters small puppies with a chainsaw...and now its radioactive. Son of a bitch! I'm about to start smoking crack...seems less harmful.

      Selex

      Does the United Nuclear's webpage sell that too?

  9. Re:Wow... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative
    The toxic dose is 0.03 micro-curies

    No it isn't. That's the standard set by OSHA which is several orders of magnitude below the toxic dose in order to prevent health effects in people working with the stuff.

    -b.

  10. Re:I might be missing something..... by joto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... But *WHY* is this stuff freely available? Shouldn't it be a controlled substance of some sort?

    Eh, why not? It's not like you need polonium 210 to kill someone. A big stick can be used for the same purpose, and rat-poison can also be bought over the counter. And unlike e.g. guns, polonium 210 has other uses than to kill people. Most of those reasons advance science.

    Apart from that, why should everything you don't have a need for, need to become "a controlled substance"? I don't know about you, but I have no wish to live in a society where everything is regulated, over-regulated, and then regulated again. I'm for gun control, because guns are a big problem in todays society. I'm not convinced that polonium 210 is a big problem in todays society.

    It almost seems that there are drugs and booze that have tighter restrictions.

    Those things are addictive. Polonium 210 isn't.

  11. Re:I might be missing something..... by Jerf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because there is nothing special about radiation.

    Too many people think of radiation as this magical, unstoppable death ray; I call this the OMG RADIATION!!1! attitude.

    Fact is, there's a whole whackload of far more dangerous things you can get your hands on legally and easily, not least of which is any number of guns, which are also very dangerous when handled carelessly or by an unskilled/untrained operator.

    Cigarettes and alcohol are pretty dangerous too, and I couldn't even begin to list the deadly poisons we can stroll into any store and buy completely legally. You can start with the pest control isle, then add the majority of the cleaning isle, and then maybe a lot of the automotive liquids (antifreeze in particular is a dangerous thing if you've got pets or children around), then tack on much of the agricultural isle. Note that I'm not listing products, I'm listing store sections, because that's how readily available these things are.

    Honestly, the only reason to prefer radioactive substances to poison someone is because it plays right into the OMG RADIATION!!1! attitude, which even here on "enlightened" slashdot is in ample supply. It's just another deadly poison; no less, but no more.

    (To break yourself of the OMG RADIATION!!1! attitude, I recommend the following: Learn about background radiation levels. (If you think that "normal radiation" levels are "zero", you are firmly in the grip of OMG RADIATION!!1!.) Learn how X-Rays work and how they compare to background. Learn about how smoke detectors work; odds are very good that you are within a few tens of meters of an OMG RADIOACTIVE! substance. This will either break you of panicking, or give you a heart attack; either way you'll be free of OMG RADIATION!!1!.)

  12. Ripoff by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't buy this stuff... it's some kind of scam. I ordered a bunch, and I set it aside until I got around to needing it. About one year later when I wanted to use it, more than 80% of it had mysteriously disappeared into thin air! Talk about planned obsolescence... and this stuff ain't cheap. This is worse than inkjet cartridges.

    Since then, I've found a place that will send me Polonium *209*. It costs more, but so far it doesn't seem have the self-destruct feature that the Polonium 210 shysters build into their product.

  13. a great Wired article on United Nuclear by pepax · · Score: 5, Informative
  14. Here's what you're missing... by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


    But *WHY* is this stuff freely available?

    It isn't. It's only available in very tiny quantities.

    Shouldn't it be a controlled substance of some sort?

    It is. Maybe you should read the article, or at least think a bit more critically that perhaps both Slashdot and Information Week are just trying to sell eyeballs here and are willing to overlook the fact that the amount available in incredibly tiny.

    It almost seems that there are drugs and booze that have tighter restrictions.

    Funny, I don't recall being able to buy arbitrary quantities of Polonium down the street from my local drug dealer (liquor stores included).

    I'm curious. Are you always so reactionary to news stories, assume the worst, and don't bother thinking critically, or only when the word "nuclear" or "radiation" is in the article?

    --
    AccountKiller
  15. Re:I might be missing something..... by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And unlike e.g. guns, polonium 210 has other uses than to kill people.

    Ugh. The vast majority of guns in the US have never, nor will they ever, be used for killing people. Seeing as how we have so few natural predators left, hunting is an absolutely vital element of the wildlife conservation effort in many countries. Hunting provides healthy, lean meat, untreated by growth hormones and antibiotics, it controls populations, reducing disease and famine, it provides funding for programs that preserve wildlife habitats....

    Guns can be used for a lot more than shooting people.

  16. Re:I might be missing something..... by BMonger · · Score: 4, Funny

    I avoid radiation at all costs. Most of the time I sit safely in front of this CRT screen here reading Slashdot.

  17. Magnetic hazards by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Modern magnets are so powerful there are real hazards. When magnets were iron or, at the high end, AlNiCo, they couldn't retain a strong enough field to make much trouble, so people thought of magnets as safe. Neodymium magnets, though, can be made strong enough to be dangerous. The Magnetix building set killed several kids when magnets came loose from the plastic parts and were ingested. The CPSC had to order a recall.

  18. Re:Loose lips sink ships by cluke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Surely not someone advocating "Security through Obscurity" on Slashdot of all places?

  19. Re:That amount isn't hazardous by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Often times these heavy elements have worse biological properties from their chemical interactions than from the radiation they emit. It might well be that it will be chemically toxic to you long before radiation becomes a worry.

    In most cases it's a combination of the two...the chemical properties will ferry the isotope to a sensitive location where the radiation can wreak havoc.

    For example, a weak alpha emitter can be held in the palm of your hand without any effects. An element that acts as a drop-in calcium replacement in the body can benignly sit in your bones. Combine both properties, and you'll have irradiated bone marrow and a world of hurt.

  20. Re:Loose lips sink ships by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Which is why the phrase "loose lips sink ships" was coined. There have been numerous headline-grabbing items like this article on Slashdot and in the media in general which serve no purpose to anyone unless you're making money from the article or you're a terrorist looking for ideas.

    Not to mention that this will draw unwanted government attention to United Nuclear which is already under investigation. So that people with a legitimate need for alpha sources (and, yes, I consider the needs of amateur scientists legit) will find them harder to obtain. If you want to murder someone with poison, there are far easier ways to do it than with polonium-210.

    -b.

  21. Re:wow, and run by a loon too by The_Wilschon · · Score: 4, Funny
    great to see the man who runs this place is certifiable
    What, you mean Taco?
    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  22. FUD: Pity the Amateur Scientist by obtuse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.unitednuclear.com/isotopes.htm Here's their explanation.

    Not enough to poison someone, almost impossible to extract, etc. Poor United Nuclear will probably be run out of business just like everyone else who helps amateur scientists.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  23. Won't detect Po210... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Po210 is an alpha emitter, so the radiation from it won't penetrate the walls of a Geiger tube to register a reading. Geiger counters are only useful for Beta and Gamma sources.

    What you need to detect an Alpha source is a scintillation detector.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  24. Re:I might be missing something..... by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    if 69 ninjas suddenly attack them

    Hmm... how would I provoke such an attack by this particular type of ninja?