Slashdot Mirror


Psiphon Now Available For Download

eldavojohn writes "Project Psiphon has been released for public download under the GPL. CNN has coverage of the Canadian research project that 'works by first allowing a person in a country like Canada that does not censor Internet content to set up a user name and a password for a person in a country that does — China, for example.' While this idea is certainly nothing new to Slashdot, the fact that software like Psiphon is becoming publicly available is interesting. For a quick simplified 'How it works,' Psiphon has a Flash demonstration." Not a moment too soon, apparently. China is moving to assign IDs to bloggers, to register their real identities and track their statements online.

18 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Excellent! by Jennifer+York · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a fantastic service! It would be a great way for the troops in Iraq to get their message out; since they recently had a big crack down too. China is not the only place where you can be prosecuted / persecuted for what you write online.

  2. Re:I can't believe... by PingSpike · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article says the data between the proxy and user is encrypted. I think the idea is there is no single point of failure. Each user has one 'contact' in the 'free' country. Even if the proxy is identified and blocked you're only cutting off one user. Whereas usually you block the servers at the source, stopping everyone from seeing it.

  3. Yikes! by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1) As always, there's a total lack of understanding here of how police states work. You think the Saudi or Myanmanmar police are going to look at your computer and say "Gee, what with your 1337 circumvention software, I guess we can't make a case against you! Have a nice day!"?

    2) On the other hand, I'm sure there *are* plenty of people who could make enthusiastic use of web browsing from some stranger's IP. But I'm sure they'd never get you in serious trouble, right?

    1. Re:Yikes! by PingSpike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You bring up some important points. The 'contact' is putting his trust in the guy he's helping do the circumvention. Its the same idea as an open wireless network. Even if you don't mind sharing your bandwidth with strangers, do you trust them to not download kiddie porn or run a phishing scam over your internet connection? That'll probably come back to bite you in the ass if they do.

      Your first point depends on how hard it is to detect that some one is using this circumvention software. They're doing something illegal obviously, but that goes without saying.

    2. Re:Yikes! by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I heard an interview on NPR last night with one of the Professors who was involved with the creation of this software. The idea behind it is that it is to be used in a web of trust, not with random strangers. So if you're mainland Chinese and you have a cousin in the US, you let him provide you the connection. Don't leave it up to strangers to provide you the connection.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  4. Not only good for people in censored countries... by B11 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But also for Americans. More and more of us are going to schools, universities, and workplaces that install and use content filtering/firewalls. Where I work most of /. isn't blocked (obviously), but curiously enough, the games and ask sections of slashdot are blocked. Most blogs and web forums are blocked as well. The sad thing is, a major part of my job is research, and more and more important information is coming via those venues (at least in my field), and other sites that being blocked.

    --
    insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
  5. Yeah... by jandersen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Brilliant. But you don't win freedom or anything else by hiding somewhere and spreading nonsense on the internet. If you want things to change, the way forward it to go out there and take the risks. The ones who don't have the courage very rarely have anything real to say. Look at our own history in the West: it is littered with examples of who changes were brought about because of the struggle of those who had vision and courage. The same thing is happening in China, and not at all slowly when you compare to how things went in Europe. Just look at what has happened in the last 20 years; did people in eg. UK ever go through such enormous changes in so short a time?

    1. Re:Yeah... by oldstrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The U.S.S.R. would still exist today if it hadn't been for all those folks "hiding" behind fax machines, getting the word out.
      Vision and Courage are great but they don't exist without information.

    2. Re:Yeah... by PingSpike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One individual revolutionary isn't going to change anything. One revolutionary that spreads his ideas to others and builds a following can. Thats why their internet is censored in the first place. It blocks the message and blocks the crucial organization of followers.

    3. Re:Yeah... by LindseyJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you vastly underestimate the actual reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union.

      (Here's a hint: It had very little to do with "folks 'hiding' behind fax machines, getting the word out.")

  6. Gee that flash video explained everything for me! by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 4, Funny

    lol. I want my 30 seconds and 15 IQ points back.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  7. Re:I think this is great... by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep - I can think of at least one legitimate use for me. Working for a large nameless and faceless corporation, they do content filtering on the firewall and sometimes some suprising things get blocked. The FreeTDS site was blocked for some dumb reason, for example. Being a UNIX system administrator, I do a lot of research on security and hacking methods (I wear a white hat, for sure) and frequently get blocked by the firewall because I'm looking up stuff on sites it labels as "hacking related". I mean, duh, the crackers and script kiddies can get to all the information about how to compromise my systems, but I can't see the same information to figure out how to safeguard them?

    I could set up my own authenticated server on my home box (Ubuntu) and proxy through it for unfettered access. Granted there'd be a speed hit because of the upload limit on the cable box, but it'd be better than having to send myself notes to download stuff at home and bring it back to work the next day on my pen drive.

    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  8. I for one welcome... by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...our new anonymous Canadian overlords... or I would... if I knew who they were... never mind.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  9. Re:Vapor Ware by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 2, Informative

    From their web site:

    When will psiphon be released?

    psiphon software will be released on December 1st, 2006, with subsequent releases to be provided as new features are added over time.

    Two things come to mind:

    1. December 1st isn't over yet
    2. Maybe they haven't updated the web site yet
    --
    Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
  10. Who is helping the Chinese government censor? by br00tus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Hippocratic oath that doctors take includes the statement "First, do no harm". What country has the corporations that are creating the architecture to allow the Chinese government to censor material? The answer is the US - Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL, Cisco and other corporations have been who have implemented this censorship for the Chinese government. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me to say you are setting up "free zones" in "free countries" to help evade censorship, when the people who control the capital in the US are the ones who have implemented the censorship in China. If this were a free country, the obvious answer would be to just have these corporations stop implementing the censorship in China. Instead, that, which is the only solution that makes any sense, is not even thought of, and instead these PR "free zones" are set up, so that Chinese people can attempt to evade (at their own personal risk) the censorship which is set up by US corporations, including the US corporations like Yahoo who helped China hunt down dissidents like Shi Tao. This stuff is a joke, if you want to stop censorship in China, stop implementing it in the US.

    1. Re:Who is helping the Chinese government censor? by massivefoot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regrettably, given the influence of business in modern government, this is unlikely to happen any time soon. The best we can do is attempt to ensure that we are responsible for as little money as possible making its way to such countries. Need to us AOL messenger service? Use a third party programme to avoid any advertising provided by AOL. Need software made by any of the above? Use an open source alternative. Or a pirated version. It's more moral than giving any money to then.

    2. Re:Who is helping the Chinese government censor? by RexRhino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh knock it off with the "EVIL CORPORATIONS!!! EVIL UNITED STATES!!!". You know if the U.S. declared a technology embargo to China, self rightous dweebs like yourself would be all up in arms that "Corporations are trying to intimidate the soveriegn nation of China and undermine socialism", just like you already do with Cuba! Censorship existed in far greater extremes in China back in the day when China was as anti-American and anti-Free-Market as yourself. Tell me the U.S. corporation that was making censorship possible back in the days of the cultural revolution, when censorship meant that having the wrong views would get you starved to death in a work camp or killed by firing squad? Since the opening of China to foriegn buisnesses, average income has increase by 1500% just in the poorest parts of China, music / movies / and books are available from all over the world, and personal freedom and expression are far greater than during the Communist era. In fact, Chinese censorship is more a dying holdover from the days when China was ruled under YOUR anti-corporation ideology of choice.

      The only thing that would happen if the U.S. stopped selling data technology to China, is that they would buy it from the Europeans instead (this is what has been happening with weapons technology - The U.S. refuses to sell high tech weapons to China, and so China buys the same or similiar weapons from Europe). That, and then you would switch to calling the U.S. refusal to sell the technology as "Economic Imperialism" and you would be all up in arms about that.

  11. Is everyone overlooking something here? by max_headroom27606 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that most people who rant about China filtering the content of their internet users are forgetting one thing.... China is not our country. They have the right to run their society any way they see fit. We tend to look at the world in a particular way, and if it doesn't match our ideal of the way things are supposed to be, we think we have the God given right to change it. Do we really have that right? How would we feel if an outside interest group decided that we needed to be changed and that our laws should be circumvented? When Yahoo stated that they would obey Chinese law and filter content, that's the price they had to pay to do business in that country, just like any foreign company would have to follow our laws when doing business here. I don't blame them for that, they want to make a profit like everyone else. The bottom line is this... China has it's laws and their citizens have to obey those laws, just as we must obey the laws in our own country. Giving the average Chinese citizen the ability to circumvent those laws is not doing them a service since the Chinese government turns dissidents into organ doners.