Slashdot Mirror


Homeland Security Tracks Information of Travelers

feuerfalke writes "Homeland Security recently disclosed a plan regarding an Automated Targeting System, or ATS, that would generate a 'terrorist risk rating' based on information collected about the traveler. This information would include things such as where they are from, how they paid for tickets, their motor vehicle records, past one-way travel, seating preference and the meals they ordered in-flight. These ratings have now been assigned to millions of international travelers, including Americans, and the ATS is exempt from many provisions of the Privacy Act — one cannot view their rating or the information used to generate it."

7 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Meals Ordered on Flight?? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Informative
  2. Re:Not trolling but.. by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the US? By number of attacks, white Christians males are responsible for the vast majority of terrorist attacks. White Christian females come in number 2. Everyone else is a distant 3rd. In yearly deathrate its the same two, but with a blip in 2001.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. Re:About Time! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Informative
    >how long until your "Good American" score will be used as a factor in court proceedings, federal hiring practices, etc. etc.?

    You mean like this?
    The government notice says some or all of the ATS data about an individual may be shared with state, local and foreign governments for use in hiring decisions and in granting licenses, security clearances, contracts or other benefits. In some cases, the data may be shared with courts, Congress and even private contractors.
  4. Re:Sounds like.... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nah... Remember that the Homeland Security is a front for corporate interests. Marketing departments will pay good money to know what Joe Blow was doing if he wasn't blowing up the plane.

  5. Re:Meals Ordered on Flight?? by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just for the record.

    They came aboard - ok ... no problem
    They made a lot of noise - ok ... happens
    They ordered - unecessary seatbelt extensions - which are heavy metal objects - ok .. no problem
    They stood up and started praying - ok ... no problem ... makes people nervous
    They sat back down ONE AT EACH EXIT OF THE PLANE - BIG problem

    These people were trying to do one of 2 things
    -> terrorist attack
    -> get themselves removed from the plane so they could call "racist"

    You're not going to tell me these people didn't have this coming.

  6. Re:How can anyone think profiling works? by drkich · · Score: 4, Informative

    * In 1986, who attempted to smuggle three pounds of explosives onto an El Al jetliner bound from London to Tel Aviv?

                            a. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
                            b. Michael Smerconish
                            c. Bob Mould
                            d. A pregnant Irishwoman named Anne Murphy

    The answer is A. She is an Irishwoman best known as the former girlfriend of the Jordanian terrorist Nezar Hindawi. While she was pregnant with his child, Hindawi convinced her to unknowingly take an explosives-laden bag on board an El Al flight. Nezar was born in 1954 and when this was committed, 1986, he was 32 years old.

    I agree, there are other people that want to kill people, just get the facts straight.

  7. Re:Meals Ordered on Flight?? by cold+fjord · · Score: 2, Informative
    Do you think you're exaggerating?

    Muslims removed from airplane when passengers found praying to be suspicious


    The Star Tribune article that you link to is appallingly bad. Practically speaking it is closer to disinformation about the incident and why the Imams were removed from the plane.

    How the imams terrorized an airliner
    Muslim religious leaders removed from a Minneapolis flight last week exhibited behavior associated with a security probe by terrorists and were not merely engaged in prayers, according to witnesses, police reports and aviation security officials. ....

    Passengers and flight attendants told law-enforcement officials the imams switched from their assigned seats to a pattern associated with the September 11 terrorist attacks and also found in probes of U.S. security since the attacks -- two in the front row first-class, two in the middle of the plane on the exit aisle and two in the rear of the cabin.

            "That would alarm me," said a federal air marshal who asked to remain anonymous. "They now control all of the entry and exit routes to the plane." .....

    According to witnesses, police reports and aviation security officials, the imams displayed other suspicious behavior.
            Three of the men asked for seat-belt extenders, although two flight attendants told police the men were not oversized. One flight attendant told police she "found this unsettling, as crew knew about the six [passengers] on board and where they were sitting." Rather than attach the extensions, the men placed the straps and buckles on the cabin floor, the flight attendant said.
            The imams said they were not discussing politics and only spoke in English, but witnesses told law enforcement that the men spoke in Arabic and English, criticizing the war in Iraq and President Bush, and talking about al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.
            The imams who claimed two first-class seats said their tickets were upgraded. The gate agent told police that when the imams asked to be upgraded, they were told no such seats were available. Nevertheless, the two men were seated in first class when removed.
            A flight attendant said one of the men made two trips to the rear of the plane to talk to the imam during boarding, and again when the flight was delayed because of their behavior. Aviation officials, including air marshals and pilots, said these actions alone would not warrant a second look, but the combination is suspicious.
            "That's like shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater. You just can't do that anymore," said Robert MacLean, a former air marshal.
            "They should have been denied boarding and been investigated," Mr. MacLean said. "It looks like they are trying to create public sympathy or maybe setting someone up for a lawsuit."
            The pilot with another airline who talked to The Washington Times on condition of anonymity, said he would have made the same call as the US Airways pilot.
            "If any group of passengers is commingling in the terminal and didn't sit in their assigned seats or with each other, I would stop everything and investigate until they could provide me with a reason they did not sit in their assigned seats."

       


    Marshals decry imams' charges
    THE FAKING IMAMS

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell