Slashdot Mirror
Civil UAVs Still A Distant Prospect
holy_calamity writes "The aerospace industry has failed to obtain the radio frequencies that would allow the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in civil airspace, New Scientist reports. It will be 2011 before it can even begin to lobby for space on the radio spectrum. What's more, no national aviation authority in the world will allow civil UAVs without a system for avoiding other aircraft. And no firm has even started development of one. Has the industry cheated us of the benefits of civil UAVs by focussing on the demands of the military?" From the article: "On the brighter side, last week the UN's International Civil Aviation Organization, based in Montreal, Canada, said its navigation experts would meet in early 2007 to consider regulations for UAVs in civil airspace. That could be a step towards internationally agreed rules for how UAVs should operate. Even if the UN body makes rapid progress, however, it will be meaningless unless the industry can obtain the necessary frequencies to control the planes and feed images and other sensor data back to base."
Civil UAV's are illegal? Then what the fuck have I been flying around the local park for the past year, a mechanical bird?
"It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
But big brother obviously has the funds and is already doing border patrol between the USA and Mexico.
The thing is, current technologies look for only really two things: motion or IR (body heat). If you were wearing enough tin foil you wouldn't have a heat signature. I recommend spray painting it black first. Then hop the fence and proceed into Texas.
One more GD thing to screw up general aviation.
"November Whisky 3 fo niner" what's the icing at one niner five ot ot?"
"You Have Mail!"
---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.