Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Spyware Law Snags Anti-Spyware Vendor

Country Lawyer writes "Washington state's anti-spyware law has just resulted in a $1 million victory for the state, the first successful prosecution under the new law. The weird thing? They sued an anti-spyware vendor." From the article: "Washington State went after the company after 1,145 state residents purchased the software and the complaints began rolling in. Secure Computer president Paul Burke will now pay $200,000 in penalties, make $75,000 worth of restitution to Washington residents, and pay another $725,000 to cover the state's attorneys' fees. The irony of an anti-spyware law being used against an anti-spyware vendor was not commented upon."

5 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Re:BS by Loco+Moped · · Score: 5, Funny

    Absolutely. Lawyers have no right to be paid for their work.

    When's the last time we paid sharks for eating swimmers?
    Same principle applies.

  2. Re:Rouge anti-spyware by sqlrob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they're really red faced after this court loss

  3. Re:BS by LordEd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, the difference is the lawyers bill you for the suit, the soap and water to clean it, and the time.

  4. When you bill 25 hours a day, 8 days a week .... by wsanders · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... 459 days per year the hours add up pretty quickly.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  5. Re:BS by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    The difference between a lawyer and a Mobster is that lawyers are afraid of getting blood on their suits. I always thought the difference was that mobsters have a code of ethics.
    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score