Slashdot Mirror


Study Shows Cell Phones Safe

PreacherTom writes "In a move worthy of the Mythbusters, scientists in Denmark tracked over 420,000 cell phone users over the course of 21 years in an attempt to determine if the urban legend that cell phone use causes cancer is true. Their results: the RF energy produced by the phones did not correlate to an increased incidence of the disease. Please note that this doesn't make chatting on the highway at 85 mph any more safe." From the article: 'This so-called Danish cohort "is probably the strongest study out there because of the outstanding registries they keep,' said Joshua Muscat of Pennsylvania State University, who also has studied cell phones and cancer. 'As the body of evidence accumulates, people can become more reassured that these devices are safe, but the final word is not there yet,' Muscat added."

3 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. They didnt let the facts get in the way before, by topham · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why start now?

  2. _other_ parts of the body by 7macaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I carry my cell phone in my pants pocket. Is it safe?

  3. It's not about Cancer. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It never was.

    It's about fuzzing the brain.

    Please pardon the bold face, but it seems this subject calls for it. . .

    The blood-brain barrier becomes permeable when exposed to EM cell phone frequencies. This is shown by injecting dye into the blood of rats and exposing them to cell phone EM. The short version: control groups don't end up with dyed brains while the exposed groups do. This experiment has been repeated numerous times.

    --Now aside from an artificially permeable blood-brain barrier making your brain more susceptible to whatever agents happen to be in your blood at the time, the really interesting question people should be instantly asking is, "How does cell phone EM cause this to happen?"

    And better yet, "What OTHER cellular responses are stimulated by cell phone EM?"

    This isn't rocket science. It's simply a matter of taking the data as it comes, remembering it as you read more articles, and applying it in a logical fashion to form more questions.

    Why the heck is everybody so caught up by the Cancer question when there is OBVIOUSLY something else important going on?


    -FL