Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Second Amendment Questioned

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the lock-and-load dept.

dheera writes "Attorneys in Washington, DC question the scope of the Second Amendment in the first case in nearly 70 years, citing that the right to bear arms only applies to 'a well regulated militia.' 'We interpret the Second Amendment in military terms,' said Todd Kim, the District's solicitor general."

5 of 1,471 comments (clear)

  1. c0m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Windows, SUN 0r (7000+1400+700)*4

  2. Re:grand-daddy's rifle by CRCulver · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Since when do mortars and automatic rifles count as "small munitions" in the context of our Second Amendment discussion?

  3. Re:Your Rights ONLINE? by BoberFett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who modded this a troll? He's right. Regardless of one's stance on the 2nd Amendment, it does NOT belong on Slashdot.

  4. Re:Your Rights ONLINE? by BoberFett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oops, this was meant to be in response to the GP.

  5. Re:US DOJ says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Great! You east Coasters f*&ked up the least coast of the US, and now you want to screw up the SW too. Whatever you do, don't move to NM. We will kill your b*tch ass!