Java Open Review Project
bvc writes "We Launched the Java Open Review Project today. We're reviewing open source Java code all the way from Tomcat down to PetStore looking for bugs and security vulnerabilities. We're using two static analysis tools to do the heavy lifting: the open source tool FindBugs, and the commercial tool Fortify SCA. We can use plenty of human eyes to help sort through the results. We're also soliciting ideas for which projects we should be reviewing next. Please help!"
You'd think someone asking for community participation would go to the effort of including a link to the community in question. Somehow, I think you'll get out of this request what you put into it.
I Browse at +4 Flamebait
Open Source Sysadmin
Link to the project's homepage
I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
Why so many projects?
Why not pick one or two and really run them through the wringer? Most of the heavily used projects like Tomcat have already been viewed by thousands of eyes so a cursory overview probably won't be worth the time
Anyways, good luck
You can't crash a Java App Server with just an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException. It will produce an error for that user, sure, but it won't propogate any farther than that. Read the specs sometime. The servlet container is responsible for trapping all exceptions thrown by the servlet, then dealing with them in an appropriate manner. Usually that means giving the user an HTTP 500 error.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
That is the argument you hear all the time. E.g, most buffer overflows in C is due to people using fixed arrays for variable length strings... which makes little sense.
Today, it seems that "archiving goals by lowering expectations" is the norm among application developers... dumping down languages to avoid features that might burn developers.
Happily, there are still quite a slew of languages which are not like that. Too bad that I still have to work in Java sometimes.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.