Slashdot Mirror


Vista Zero-Day Exploit For Sale

Snakepit Bit writes "Underground hackers are hawking a zero-day exploit for Windows Vista at $50,000 a pop, according to computer security researchers at Trend Micro. The Windows Vista exploit, which has not been independently verified, was just one of many zero-days available for sale at an auction-style marketplace infiltrated by the anti-virus vendor. Prices for exploits for unpatched code execution flaws are in the $20,000 to $30,000 range. Bots and Trojan downloaders that typically hijack Windows machines for use in botnets were being sold for about $5,000." From the article: "According to [Trend Micro CTO Raimund] Genes, the typical price of a destructive exploit has increased dramatically, driving an underground market that could exceed the value of the legitimate security software business. 'I think the malware industry is making more money than the anti-malware industry,' Genes said."

1 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Please define "zero-day" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The media idiots and security vendors bastardized this term. 0-day originally meant an vulnerability unknown to the vendor hence there is no patch or work-around for it.

    Then security vendors tried to use it to mean any vulnerability without a patch, known or unknown because then they could rightly claim that their software mitigated a 0-day vulnerability, which really meant thier software could mitigate a known vulnerability. That's where the media idiots jumped in because 0-day sound cool and scary.

    There is no point in trying to correct them. That ship has sailed. Just like "hacker" now means criminal when the original definition was a badge of honor.

    Now that the vulnerability is known, it is just an unpatched vulnerability.