Slashdot Mirror


FSF Launches "BadVista" Campaign

FrankNFurter writes to note the launch yesterday of the FSF's BadVista campaign against Microsoft's new operating system. BadVista's aim is to inform users about the alleged harms inflicted by Vista on the user and about free software alternatives. Quoting program administrator John Sullivan: "Vista is an upsell masquerading as an upgrade. It is an overall regression when you look at the most important aspect of owning and using a computer: your control over what it does. Obviously MS Windows is already proprietary and very restrictive, and well worth rejecting. But the new 'features' in Vista are a Trojan Horse to smuggle in even more restrictions. We'll be focusing attention on detailing how they work, how to resist them, and why people should care."

2 of 607 comments (clear)

  1. "Treacherous Computing" "Genuine upgrade promlems" by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the article, They mention the Treacherous Computing nature of the OS and that the Genuine checks cause problems with upgrades. Though more details would be helpful.

    Eventually MS and others pushing [Un]Trusted Computing and Digital Restrictions Management will find out that the strangle grip is not the best way to hold and attract costumers.

  2. More detail (Re:"Treacherous Computing" "Genuine by quentin_quayle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This page says something about the nature of Vista. It shows the six privilege levels:

    • Trusted Installer
    • System
    • High
    • Medium
    • Low
    • Untrusted

    The owner of the computer, even with root ("Administrator") status, can have at most only the third privilege level.

    Are you content to be only a tenant in a system where someone else retains ultimate control? If you prefer to own your own copy of an OS, you will have to choose free software over Vista.